Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — smcnc

smcnc

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 09, 2019, 6:59 PM UTC
HN karma
32
Public activity
36 items

About smcnc

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49039944

    I could be mistaken, but isn't Paxel a tool that YC *itself* built to understand how founders/applicants apply AI? If so, this feels less scary than some of the comments (i.e. not …

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #47781178

    One thing I noticed on the CS PhD side of the house is because many researchers don't want others to easily build upon their work (for whatever reasons), they don't often release t…

  4. comment
    Comment #47697394

    We’re both #DudesForKamala

  5. comment
    Comment #47684412

    I was merely responding to replies directed at me. But that is probably good advice. No opinion was ever changed online. :)

  6. comment
    Comment #47684318

    “Flee and reside in hotels” not equal to relocate and continue mission. The major operational staff at these bases still work there. Support was relocated not fleeing.

  7. comment
    Comment #47684147

    US soldiers get hotels when fleeing? Wtf lol

  8. comment
    Comment #47684109

    [flagged]

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #47684072

    [flagged]

  11. comment
    Comment #47684057

    US blew up C-130s stuck in sand. A few got shot up. Iranians on the ground got the brunt of the bullets, however.

  12. comment
    Comment #47684046

    There’s a difference between occupation (where this wins) and deterrence (where they can’t attack your country). The latter was the primary objective.

  13. comment
    Comment #47684022

    Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease …

  14. comment
    Comment #47683971

    This is now Vietnam with no boots on the ground or years of war? Wow! Thanks

  15. comment
    Comment #47683952

    More leverage with less conventional firepower? Objectives of reducing conventional military threats and nuclear weapons seem less now, no?

  16. comment
    Comment #47683919

    Uncertainty.

  17. comment
    Comment #47683903

    > 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.

  18. comment
    Comment #47683895

    Agree with same comment as above. > This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was…

  19. comment
    Comment #47683875

    This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “wi…

  20. comment
    Comment #47683850

    Cost of insurance for ships did.

  21. comment
    Comment #47683841

    Search and rescue. Yes, it takes assets. Correct.

  22. comment
    Comment #47683780

    Insightful

  23. comment
    Comment #47683756

    [flagged]

  24. comment
    Comment #47683643

    I don’t see how the majority of comments paint this as a victory for Iran. Your entire formal military apparatus was destroyed, nuclear sites in rubble, defense industrial complex …

  25. comment
    Comment #46494023

    It’s pretty clear it was your post/project you reference, but how do you know he got inspiration from you ? Did OP post on your Reddit post, confirming they were even aware of it? …