Viewing profile — smcnc
smcnc
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 09, 2019, 6:59 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 36 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About smcnc
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49039944
I could be mistaken, but isn't Paxel a tool that YC *itself* built to understand how founders/applicants apply AI? If so, this feels less scary than some of the comments (i.e. not …
- story
-
comment
Comment #47781178
One thing I noticed on the CS PhD side of the house is because many researchers don't want others to easily build upon their work (for whatever reasons), they don't often release t…
-
comment
Comment #47697394
We’re both #DudesForKamala
-
comment
Comment #47684412
I was merely responding to replies directed at me. But that is probably good advice. No opinion was ever changed online. :)
-
comment
Comment #47684318
“Flee and reside in hotels” not equal to relocate and continue mission. The major operational staff at these bases still work there. Support was relocated not fleeing.
-
comment
Comment #47684147
US soldiers get hotels when fleeing? Wtf lol
-
comment
Comment #47684109
[flagged]
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47684072
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47684057
US blew up C-130s stuck in sand. A few got shot up. Iranians on the ground got the brunt of the bullets, however.
-
comment
Comment #47684046
There’s a difference between occupation (where this wins) and deterrence (where they can’t attack your country). The latter was the primary objective.
-
comment
Comment #47684022
Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease …
-
comment
Comment #47683971
This is now Vietnam with no boots on the ground or years of war? Wow! Thanks
-
comment
Comment #47683952
More leverage with less conventional firepower? Objectives of reducing conventional military threats and nuclear weapons seem less now, no?
-
comment
Comment #47683919
Uncertainty.
-
comment
Comment #47683903
> 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
-
comment
Comment #47683895
Agree with same comment as above. > This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was…
-
comment
Comment #47683875
This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “wi…
-
comment
Comment #47683850
Cost of insurance for ships did.
-
comment
Comment #47683841
Search and rescue. Yes, it takes assets. Correct.
-
comment
Comment #47683780
Insightful
-
comment
Comment #47683756
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47683643
I don’t see how the majority of comments paint this as a victory for Iran. Your entire formal military apparatus was destroyed, nuclear sites in rubble, defense industrial complex …
-
comment
Comment #46494023
It’s pretty clear it was your post/project you reference, but how do you know he got inspiration from you ? Did OP post on your Reddit post, confirming they were even aware of it? …