Viewing profile — sharpener
sharpener
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 15, 2021, 9:09 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sharpener
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38044402
Or only for the things that experience gravity as a curved surface? Gravity, arguably, does not experience gravity as a curved surface.
-
comment
Comment #38039828
My guess... In the mathematics of the physics, gravity is a scalar field. We don't really know what gravity is, we just have various descriptions that seem to be useful at various …
-
comment
Comment #35501682
Some thoughts... On the connected question of why human societies accelerated their development over time (recently posted on HN) a couple of comments are pertinent (see [0] and [1…
-
comment
Comment #33066509
Efficient proprioception is useless if key behavioural incentives are misaligned with key aspects of the environment. Humans are quite good at creating collective organisations tha…
-
comment
Comment #32620333
Imho, RRO only works well if some additional rules are added, to hold from the outset and throughout the process. As a prototype offering: 1. There must be sufficient representativ…
-
comment
Comment #31639568
I agree with the comments that the article is misdirecting fluff. Cutting through... All organised systems (anything that we would describe as a system as opposed to random or chao…
-
comment
Comment #31598112
An untested idea/suggestion... In the first Open Problem, maybe the generator tweak for random Hamiltonian paths is that two grids are needed: one for the eventual H-path; and one …
-
comment
Comment #31173847
Maybe someone familiar with the graph theory math can help me. I don't understand why these properties aren't numerically accessible. Why is the estimation necessary? E.g. Assume N…
-
comment
Comment #30723757
Why CO2 from air vs. extraction from seawater? I remember seeing some papers (e.g. [0]) suggesting the from seawater route was way more efficient per m^3 processed with a lot less …
-
comment
Comment #29110928
I am not a lawyer, but... a public interest clause might not be the right tool, since public interest can be interpreted as restricted to information that would affect a person's v…
-
comment
Comment #28459605
After constructing a better diagram that lens idea looks false too. Similar triangles win again.
-
comment
Comment #28425704
A fair approach. Incidentally, I just drew some diagrams and with the assumptions that the Earth is not at the centre of expansion, Earth orbit has extremes (for parallax), and all…
-
comment
Comment #28424647
I'm not a cosmologist but... Is it possible to have both photon tiring and expansion and still measure the same numbers in experiment? Also wouldn't the arc separation of deep fiel…
-
comment
Comment #27871562
For the sake of HN archival history... The executive summary of my paper is that provably there are fatal inconsistencies in Cantor's Diagonal Argument (CDA). They take a few forms…
-
comment
Comment #27857448
Lawvere's paper appears to suggest that if I refute one diagonal argument then I refute them all. Would you consider that to be an accurate description?
-
comment
Comment #27857315
I'm not seeing this yet. Perhaps you could explain it to me in plain terms.
-
comment
Comment #27856063
> Theorem: There is no bijection between ℕ and {0, 1}*. So no bijection between \bb{N} in an unspecified number base and some binary strings that could represent integers? That's a…
-
comment
Comment #27855210
> Define a function z(n) = 1 - f(n)(n). I don't understand the notation f(n)(n). Is it related to f_{nn} in LaTeX notation? Your later text suggests maybe it was aiming at f(n,n) s…
-
comment
Comment #27850331
The mileage of others may vary, but it has been my experience that there is no cogent solid proof of uncountability that can withstand concerted critique.[0] Being charitable one m…