Viewing profile — resonious

I think you want to make sure you don't hold a database connection while waiting on other slow async work (like outgoing HTTP requests). Then you can more feasibly have more worker…

> At 7 it may seem excitingly ambitious to build huge things out of Lego, then at 14 to teach yourself calculus, till at 21 you're starting to explore unanswered questions in physi…

That probably is what it means and I think there's still value in the analysis.

This is huge... At least from what I've seen, many companies (even if they don't know it) are largely sloppy R&D shops. Most people are on projects that are highly speculative and …

> if the code goes boom, it's on the developer This is the same argument C (and Zig!) people have for manual memory management. You can avoid memory problems by being a good develo…

This varies wildly person to person but for me, it's not only about the means. It's a combination of means and end. If I want the computer to do something, and the only way to get …

The game changes when it's not just "Opus vs Sonnet", but "Opus vs GLM". The amount saved is way more than even $0.04. And it's not only money but speed. Some providers can serve G…

This sounds like not the best workflow. If your prompt is that long, you may not be spending your time very efficiently. Splitting problems into smaller problems is huge. You want …

How much does it cost? I even made an account and I cannot find pricing anywhere...

So it's GLM-5.2 performance for almost twice the price. That said, the speed looks really good. I think it's competitive with Fireworks's GLM 5.2 Fast, although Fireworks is still …

Why does KV cache matter if they show it's cheaper anyway?

The article shows that it's still cheaper to pay for the switch than it is to let the frontier model do all the work. At least in benchmarks. If you want to interact with plans the…

> for frontier work. I'll agree that GPT 5.6 may well be the best given the above contstraint, but for run-of-the-mill dev tasks (real ones, not benchmark ones), GLM 5.2 still blow…

Oh My Pi has it. I'm a big OMP shill right now. Seems not very popular, but it has the stability of Pi with the features Opencode (and more I think; OMP has web browsing and a more…

Just features for the client. The same stuff I was shipping before but much faster and more stable.

Trust me there are plenty of us using cloud AI to actually ship stuff. We just aren't writing blog posts about it.

The artificialanalysis cost per task chart has DeepSeek as the clear winner and Fable as the clear loser. But I would still pick Fable for some tasks, so that also can't be all the…

> But artificial intelligence, far more than any tool we’ve ever created, intends us not just to sit forward and behave, but to cease to think critically, to cease to imagine, and,…

I consider myself an LLM maximalist, at least in the context of software engineering. Even after delegating everything you can to LLMs, there's still work left for you. And it's fa…

Right I saw them saying something along the lines of "they're good at subagents". But this seems true even with third party harnesses. So I'm wondering what Codex is hiding.

I've also seen Google indexing pages with random values in the path that don't get linked to statically (server asks for the URL then redirects to it immediately). I'm pretty sure …

I guess this implies that non-Codex harnesses get a little bit worse? In wondering what's so special about their subagents system that they feel the need to hide these messages...

"This is the part where you think/learn" and "this is the part where you just let the LLM figure it out" is a fine format for advice nowadays I think. I am getting a little tired o…

This seems like a lot. I told my oh-my-pi agent to build my ios app for me and send it to me remotely. After some chugging, it gave me a tailscale funnel link. And it worked. I did…