OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
simonwillison.net
OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
1–10 of 475 posts
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#2Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#3[flagged]
> There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective … To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#4[flagged]
Did you read the article you are commenting on? > There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective … To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#5Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you read the article you are commenting on? > There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective … To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand
It’s not helped that the headline is cutoff in a pretty unfortunate way
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#7Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#8The title (currently "OpenAI's accidental cyberattack against Hugging Face is science fiction") suggests some information had been hidden that makes the incident less significant than claimed. The article argues the opposite, and the last two words of the full title are "that happened."
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#9[flagged]
Did you read the article you are commenting on? > There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective … To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand
Re: OpenAI’s accidental attack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened
#10Since it's buried towards the bottom I'll quote the section "Resist the temptation to write this off as a stunt" here in full https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/22/openai-cyberattack/#re...
> Resist the temptation to write this off as a stunt
> There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective. I found 81 instances of the term “marketing” in the Hacker News discussion of the incident.
> To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand - you’re now including Hugging Face in your conspiracy theories, just so you can deny the crescendo of evidence here!
> The best models we have today have the ability to both find and exploit new vulnerabilities. The ExploitGym paper itself concludes that “autonomous exploit development by frontier AI agents is no longer a hypothetical capability”, and this incident is a perfect example of exactly that.