Viewing profile — misslibby

The principle is that nobody should be forced to employ somebody they don't want to employ. Right to be one's own boss: it is called freedom. It doesn't have to be written in the c…

What does it have to do with the law of averages? It certainly has nothing to do with American history. It is a fundamental principle.

> American firms mostly simply did not hire black people until the law forced them to (especially to skilled-labor jobs). And the evidence that this restriction was primarily based…

> I can't bridge the gap if we're not working from the same collection of facts, sorry. I wonder what your sources are? For sure black people were able to work throughout history. …

> This is an odd sentiment and I don't know what to make of it. I'm assuming you don't think only non-liberals can create a hostile work environment, so what do you mean? You claim…

> You just follow up on reports. That's what you do. And then you simply fire the non-liberals involved? Hostile work environment is usually people not getting along. I don't think…

Iirc there was one event that might qualify as deception, when he claimed he already had funding secured from some entity and that made some other entity (the government?) also giv…

Most companies don't need lots of people. And setting their own work conditions is exactly what is at stake - which also impacts workers, as it also limits their choice of companie…

You are incredible. 1.) he doesn't have to justify reinstating Trump at all. People who banned a sitting president have to justify their actions 2.) Seriously, what the fuck - you …

I don't live in the US. What socialist like you keep forgetting is that somebody has to provide the jobs that you claim the rights to. If nobody provides the jobs, you can make law…

> Freedom only for the owners of companies? Everybody can start a company - or should be allowed to, that is the point. Socialist rules making it difficult prevent people from beco…

> Freedom to what, in this context? The freedom to work in the way they want. To escape the hamster wheel, for example by starting their own company with the conditions they prefer…

Of course the situations are comparable. Your only explanation was that there is a law for the one situation but (allegedly) not the other. Which probably isn't even true, as you m…

Lawsuits don't prove he lied.

People fret about the programming languages they use all the time...

The explanation is simple: freedom. People forget that when they curb the freedom of their employers, they also curb their own freedoms at the same time. They make sure that they c…

The usual list. He clearly isn't a leftist and it angers a lot of people very much that he doesn't automatically follow the leftist commands. Doesn't make him evil or a liar. And f…

Doesn't sound like such a clear cut case. Has the court decided yet?

That's your opinion as a probably left leaning person. Other people may think differently. That such laws were passed 50 years ago does not prove that they were a net positive.

Your argument was that "so and so did break the law". I answered that just because something is a law, it isn't good or correct. If you don't see the relevancy, I don't know what e…

Maybe his colleagues didn't like Diaz much. I don't approve of such slurs, on the other hand, I am in favor of free speech and people being in charge of their own companies. Lousy …

Such as?

Just because something is a law, doesn't imply it is good or justified.

Musk has claimed on Twitter that Tesla wasn't allowed to present new evidence, and that the fine would have been 0 with the new evidence. But he says the jury did the best with the…