Viewing profile — menacingly
menacingly
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 27, 2012, 2:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,122
- Public activity
- 484 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About menacingly
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48335613
I don't understand how anyone is still primarily thinking about single-user scenarios in 2026
-
comment
Comment #43134454
I don't know the particulars, but in general, silence around a massive tech company on warrants does not mean "they said no and the feds decided to leave them alone"
-
comment
Comment #42588365
stuff like this working is why you get odd situations like "don't hallucinate" actually producing fewer hallucinations. it's to me one of the most interesting things about llms
-
comment
Comment #42372613
they seemed to enjoy the internet access in russia
-
comment
Comment #41918629
This is great!
-
comment
Comment #41594330
sum the amount of "you simply " in this thread, then account for the fact that we're talking about running afoul of a regulation if you don't understand it, and you end up with a h…
-
comment
Comment #41587115
I'm surprised I don't see it more. You can't impose a regulatory burden more troublesome than your traffic is worth
-
comment
Comment #41584235
Decentralized on centralized hardware?
-
comment
Comment #41102692
could something like steam or a linux distro use it to distribute software? seems crazy not to. I think what people are saying is we know there is probably a silent line somewhere,…
-
comment
Comment #41102604
I'm not sure selectively enforced shakedowns instill a lot of confidence either
-
comment
Comment #40949899
unless I'm misunderstanding, the same data could be pulled from those services. the message content wasn't leaked here
-
comment
Comment #40784177
You're only allowed to believe LLMs are a kind of digital messiah or that they're complete hype garbage, when of course the answer is some point between. There is obviously a lot o…
-
comment
Comment #40667091
it’s similar asking the gemini-1.5 models about coding questions that involve auth one of my questions about a login form also tripped a harassment flag
-
comment
Comment #40637022
it will defer to the server a _lot_, if you just consider the capability they can fit on that phone
-
comment
Comment #40636902
if the servers are so private, why is on-device such a win? here are some irrelevant distractions: - the cpu arch of the servers - mentioning that you have to trust vendors not to …
-
comment
Comment #40636803
microsoft was always going to take SMBs. Data is what makes them useful, so Microsoft keeps their SMBs, Apple gets consumers, Google gets their slice of productivity and android, w…
-
comment
Comment #40636734
The privacy conversation was pretty shady, and honestly full of technical holes with pointless misleading distractions
-
comment
Comment #40636601
you should have seen them when they had a soul
-
comment
Comment #40636552
it feels like microsoft showing off apple software
-
comment
Comment #40636543
To a technical person, the discussion around AI felt really creepy and disingenuous, full of irrelevant distractions
-
comment
Comment #40636045
this is the video form of "bug fixes and performance improvements", and about as charismatic
-
comment
Comment #40632415
the more reasonable assumption is that it uses a third party crawl service. but still, it doesn't matter, it's acting on behalf of a user, and you aren't entitled to know what soft…
-
comment
Comment #40629551
we've all been there, go get 'em
-
comment
Comment #40629489
I like the idea. Looks like you've got some kinks, happens to the best of us. I look forward to playing with it when you get those ironed out. Also, I don't care if you respect rob…
-
comment
Comment #40603663
it's because there is some sense among the physics-challenged that apple has to support it in hardware, as if we're a generation away from placing the burn-inducing, fusion-reactor…