Viewing profile — meindnoch

cc @burntsushi

>according to that regex this is a valid url >__..__..%%%zz.. Correctly. It is a valid relative URI, whose path is "__..__..%%%zz..".

>The problem comes when you try to break down the authority portion into host and port That's a problem orthogonal to URI parsing. You parse the URI with the RFC 3986 regex, which …

Is that so? RFC 3986 Appendix B [1] "Parsing a URI Reference with a Regular Expression": The following line is the regular expression for breaking-down a well-formed URI reference …

AI-generated image → instant churn

Pretty disgusting tbh.

I smell vapor.

Well, we knew since the "Roko's Basilisk" debacle that they're prone to magical thinking.

How did he predict your comment?

"This is also how I learned one way that Photoshop was for professionals and GIMP & ImageMagick weren’t; At the time (and this was years ago, to be fair), Photoshop dithered by def…

Absolutely! Higher precision is always better. But if you must go as low as 8bits, you should dither.

8 bit per component = 0-255 red, 0-255 green, 0-255 blue Like ~99% of images you encounter on the Web.

Joe Rogan tier pseudoscience.

Yeah. But even if you stay in the digital realm, dithering is necessary at 8bits per component. Consider that a grayscale gradient can only have 256 distinct levels.

Every image should be dithered below 10 bits/component to prevent banding artifacts.

Good!

Stop polluting Wikipedia.

And they will be proven wrong, like with crypto... oh wait.

I think your workplace might have a problem with sexual harassment.

Does this look like a bad place to live? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Round_Houses_in_Moscow Easter European commie blocks usually have strategically placed parks, shopping, k…

The first-order difference of the prime-counting function: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime-counting_function

>Cement/Concrete (based on Portland cement) is water proof That's patently untrue. Otherwise we wouldn't need concrete sealants.

If you have a pretty vanilla taste, sure.

Lost? It's as alive as ever, if you're in the right circles.

>Should we ensure all interactions have at least 100ms of latency Web developers are already hard at work on this.