Viewing profile — johnfn
johnfn
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 27, 2009, 8:36 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 13,014
- Public activity
- 2,109 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About johnfn
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49218184
I think “soulless” crosses a line into unkind. Just say you don’t like AI generated text.
-
comment
Comment #49214185
> the one-word lines The funny thing is that there are no "one-word lines". This more or less cements the fact that it must be AI in my mind.
-
comment
Comment #49156681
Ouch, this seems unnecessarily harsh for a side project made for fun. This might be acceptable if this was a low effort single prompt to an AI but it’s pretty clear from the write …
-
comment
Comment #49129116
384 is a tad small. How does it perform on 1k/2k/4k..?
-
comment
Comment #49117795
AWS never "humblebrags" about an outage. No blog post looks as good as an extra 9.
-
comment
Comment #49117556
Companies post deeply embarrassing eng blogs all the time. See: every post about downtime or a security incident ever.
-
comment
Comment #49101524
> If their AI finished it, where's the release? `bun upgrade --canary`. You can use it today. Keeping a large release, like a total rewrite, on canary for a while to iron out bugs …
-
comment
Comment #49065274
This is really good - miles ahead of almost all other math writing I have read. One particular thing I really liked was the explanation of the determinant. When I was in college I …
-
comment
Comment #49063867
But surely at some point you need to stop, right? Most web developers are perfectly capable without understanding the intricacies of the file system or OS, even though the browser …
-
comment
Comment #49062221
The response says "I also believe we can do better". How is that in any way "you're holding it wrong"?
-
comment
Comment #49060821
To be blunt the degree to which I take these projects seriously is basically the same as how extensive their eval suite is. A single guided refactor is better than nothing, but one…
-
comment
Comment #49059303
Pangram said a bunch of reasonable things and responded very coherently to the point and you skipped over it and misinterpreted this one section.
-
comment
Comment #49059139
This issue is, like, exactly what the response from Pangram is talking about.
-
comment
Comment #49048884
How do you propose they check for something like this? They can't exactly ctrl-f the model weights for "Arc-AGI".
-
comment
Comment #49042626
This doesn't seem quite right. For one, I don't need all the intelligence of an expensive model like Opus 5 to do the relatively simple task of choosing a correct model for a task.…
-
comment
Comment #49040529
Sure Claude would comply, but Anthropic has no financial (or other) incentive to optimize this, so there’s no reason to expect it to be particularly good. It would be like asking t…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49040172
I see a pretty big gap between finding software vulnerabilities and “the world is about to end”. It is literally true that AI models are finding software vulnerabilities. It is als…
-
comment
Comment #49039740
I think I agree with you, so maybe you meant to ask someone else? Or you’re just supporting my argument, in which case I appreciate it :-)
-
comment
Comment #49039706
This doesn’t seem obviously true, eg an Anthropic model will never route to Kimi even if it were best suited for a particular task.
-
comment
Comment #49038764
I think the burden of proof is on you to argue that Codeberg will stop at exactly two policies, given they haven’t said they will do that, but they have already banned things they …
-
comment
Comment #49013389
> Non-math fields tend to reuse regular words as jargon Isn’t this the field with a “closed” “set”, an “open” “set”, oh and also a “clopen” “set” for some reason?
-
comment
Comment #48969120
Why would rewriting Claude code, an app which probably has 30-40 (I might be significantly underestimating) extremely active contributors be easier than rewriting Bun, which has fe…
-
comment
Comment #48943606
Pangram clearly says "Remember, our results aren’t based on this evidence." when you turn on supporting evidence.
-
comment
Comment #48929572
Sure and OpenAI articles aren’t negative because of Sam Altman, Anthropic articles aren’t negative because of Dario etc…