Claude Opus 5
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 5
#2here we go
Re: Claude Opus 5
#3Very interesting to see such a focus on cost for performance here
Re: Claude Opus 5
#4> arc-agi-3 30.2%
wow
Re: Claude Opus 5
#5What really impress me is opus 5 is better in alignment than fable 5!
Re: Claude Opus 5
#6> Claude Opus 5 is not more capable overall than our most capable general-access model, Claude Fable 5
Ok then so what's the point?
Re: Claude Opus 5
#7> Claude Opus 5 is not more capable overall than our most capable general-access model, Claude Fable 5 Ok then so what's the point?
Presumably, it’s cheaper.
Re: Claude Opus 5
#8Very impressive headline benchmark numbers. I expected a step change, but not past Fable. That said - it all depends on whether the classifiers make the model unusable...
Re: Claude Opus 5
#9> Claude Opus 5 is not more capable overall than our most capable general-access model, Claude Fable 5 Ok then so what's the point?
The cost?
Re: Claude Opus 5
#10> Claude Opus 5 is not more capable overall than our most capable general-access model, Claude Fable 5 Ok then so what's the point?
This is useful to me since I delegate most coding tasks to Opus and use Fable for planning.