Viewing profile — indefatigable
indefatigable
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 21, 2013, 12:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 11
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About indefatigable
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6579703
So what, these foreigners ought to be denied the same opportunity?
-
comment
Comment #6554467
The day any comment thread can be closed because it satisfies some criteria for a "flame war" is the last day I'll even think about posting here again.
-
comment
Comment #6533691
Any thread about environmental topics becomes a space to debate environmental politics, just like any thread about the US government becomes a space for leftists and right-libertar…
-
comment
Comment #6384230
I'm not sure absolute falsification is meaningful with this kind of prediction. Then it's not science.
-
comment
Comment #6384121
Yep, great movie.
-
comment
Comment #6384061
OK that's good to hear. But read about the history of eugenics if you'd like to know how other people might misinterpret your argument.
-
comment
Comment #6384032
What situation would falsify the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming? Or the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic ocean acidification?
-
comment
Comment #6384001
When someone says they have the right to dictate not only how much energy I use, but also where that energy comes from, I call it fascism.
-
comment
Comment #6383970
Yeah yeah, I read Ishmael too.
-
comment
Comment #6383942
Stewardship means handing it over to fascists?
-
comment
Comment #6383707
That's it, thanks!
-
comment
Comment #6383633
We seem to disagree, as I'm convinced that a carbon tax would almost certainly be an unmitigated disaster.
-
comment
Comment #6383558
Most scientists agreed that fire involved phlogiston not so very long ago.
-
comment
Comment #6383513
Giving politicians the authority to levy a carbon tax is an absolutely terrible idea, and it has nothing to do with how I feel about China.
-
comment
Comment #6383461
Someone laments the fact that we're all doomed and wants to upend the social order, then someone else replies with a casual implication that population control would be an effectiv…
-
comment
Comment #6383420
Actually it seems like that's not the correct attribution. It was probably Peter Marshall: "Give to us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand for—because un…
-
comment
Comment #6383112
Someone famous once said something to the effect of: "When people believe in nothing, they will believe anything." Interestingly enough most of those people are completely in denia…
-
comment
Comment #6383061
Since regulating CO2 is such a useful political tool, it's not surprising that a new hypothesis justifying regulation has been making its way into the mainstream as the global warm…
-
comment
Comment #6329756
Ah well, everybody has their off days.
-
comment
Comment #6323331
Yet Germany has institutionalized the same mentality on a more abstract level. "Global warming might be happening, shut down the energy industry!" "We can't use nuclear power, some…
-
comment
Comment #6305669
Wot wot pip pip cheerio get the torch line's engaged eat some crisps there's a good chap.
-
comment
Comment #6274294
In other words, we should trust the DHHS and the IRS with information that the NSA can't be trusted to access? Am I reading that correctly?
-
comment
Comment #6258303
Your opinions are provided by PageRank? Good to know.
-
comment
Comment #6249856
I'm getting a serious Poe's law vibe from this comment and username.