Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — grinnbearit

grinnbearit

HN member
Joined
Sat, Sep 12, 2009, 3:22 AM UTC
HN karma
143
Public activity
151 items

About grinnbearit

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14751072

    I don't know about a lot of other countries but India's economic boom started after liberalisation[1] in the 90s, before that India was far poorer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ec…

  2. comment
    Comment #14520001

    Aesthetic preferences exist for a reason, they've also been selected for and would often correlate with health indicators. In the end reproductive success is all that's selected fo…

  3. comment
    Comment #14146232

    Chris Stucchio wrote an interesting blog post which changed my mind on this. Instead of exacerbating it, a Machine Learning model can actively correct for bias. https://www.chrisst…

  4. comment
    Comment #13047998

    A progressive consumption tax is less distortive (favours productivity over consumption) than a progressive income tax, its just harder to implement.

  5. comment
    Comment #13047971

    You'd always prefer $100 today vs $100 in a year. In order to convince someone to invest you need to offer them more than that in the future. If the discount rate is 10% (not bank …

  6. comment
    Comment #13045463

    You tax capital gains differently than earned income to incentivise investment over consumption. This is because consumption today is always more valuable than consumption in the f…

  7. comment
    Comment #13042987

    The Sino Indian war is more complicated than that, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/It-wasnt-China-but-...

  8. comment
    Comment #12709049

    One man's "crap" is another's fine dining. I believe values are subjective and we choose what we value with our wallets. > teaches them to have low expectations from what they buy …

  9. comment
    Comment #12707850

    Profits come from satisfying people's values [1], if more "higher quality" doesn't lead to more profits, it isn't valued. As an aside, I'd be skeptical of Artists who produce "Insp…

  10. comment
    Comment #12651106

    That doesn't makes sense, the only reason race would matter is if we're not using all other available information For example, imagine if income perfectly explained default rates. …

  11. comment
    Comment #12627573

    It also incentivises the google engineer to be as productive as they possibly can, assuming that salaries are indicative of marginal utility. Otherwise the engineer could spend his…

  12. comment
    Comment #12253765

    Valuable for satisfying human desires The theory is that people spend money on what they desire, and so companies that generate more money satisfy more human values. You will alway…

  13. comment
    Comment #12253437

    Finance isn't evil; day trading, investment banking, venture capital are all sharing information with the world and trying to move money to places where its more valuable. There is…

  14. comment
    Comment #12099446

    The reason we (as a society) inflate currencies is because of "sticky wages". People are loss averse and react much worse to a 5% pay cut than positively to a 5% pay rise. Because …

  15. comment
    Comment #11984881

    People get value out of a society by consuming goods and services, income is how we as a society measure the value a person provides. Income Tax taxes value provided, Consumption T…

  16. comment
    Comment #11326593

    Here's an interesting video that takes that into account. Twins, even those that grow up separately, are remarkably similar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDFh74eENuw

  17. comment
    Comment #11092389

    How about a progressive consumption tax?

  18. comment
    Comment #11092380

    Proportional representation makes sense because morality & values are subjective. Its implementation leaves a lot to be desired (see futarchy).

  19. comment
    Comment #10914866

    I disagree, take India and China, both developing nations with populations that are significantly better off after adopting some form of Capitalism.

  20. comment
    Comment #10716738

    Actually yes, Chris Stucchio's posts on the subject are pretty in depth starting with https://www.chrisstucchio.com/blog/2012/hft_apology.html You could also look at the book, Flas…

  21. comment
    Comment #10578892

    > The idea that women's liberation and the abolishment of slavery are "arbitrarily" positive things, and that we may like them exactly as likely as we may not via some senseless qu…

  22. comment
    Comment #10572914

    Thanks for the tips, r/AskPhilosophy has a lot of discussion on the topic. I am also interested to know why you seem to prefer Moral Realism. > As such, to claim that "there is no …

  23. comment
    Comment #10572424

    Moral realists have the upper hand? Are you willing to share some articles covering the topic? For example, http://slatestarcodex.com/ and http://lesswrong.com/ have plenty of essa…

  24. comment
    Comment #10524808

    Why do you think house prices and rents are very correlated? People buy houses as an investment which can very quickly raise the price while rents depend on housing demand which de…

  25. comment
    Comment #10486894

    Hmm, thats a lot to respond to, I'm going to start with just a small part initially. I'm not taking free markets to be a foundation for morality, I'm saying that I believe morality…