Viewing profile — foltik
foltik
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 09, 2021, 11:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 594
- Public activity
- 246 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About foltik
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49207328
It’s described in this patent application [0]. There’s a bit of hand waving so the HC1 might be slightly different, but the gist is the same. https://patents.justia.com/patent/2025…
-
comment
Comment #49203970
I avoid closed source software because it’s often a pain to use on Linux.
-
comment
Comment #49203373
At least in the case of Taalas the weights are physically encoded directly on the chip. It’s composed of 4-bit multiplier cells that compute all 16 possible results in parallel. Th…
-
comment
Comment #49123685
Where do I sign up to get $100M to dump into long AI positions?
-
comment
Comment #49123650
Just let them have their AI pacifier.
-
comment
Comment #49098601
I read through the explanations and they’re all typical hand wavy LLM prose, full of jargon, and random tangential details. If you’re going to publicly present this as a learning t…
-
comment
Comment #49083795
No, the reports specifically mention that the AI target selection pipeline drastically increased the workload and expectations of the humans in the loop, leading to spending far le…
-
comment
Comment #48991498
Your site has a bunch of marketing copy, trademark symbols, and a link to pay you $2k/mo, but zero technical detail and is broken on mobile. It gives vibe coded. The benchmark of 2…
-
comment
Comment #48956942
And proving my point: https://github.com/ChristofferGreen/PrimeStruct/blob/d4f1a8e...
-
comment
Comment #48928517
Sounds like they did the ol “grok please make this secure” and it slopped out this plausible-if-you-squint nonsense. Rendering untrusted model output, ooh scary! Of course we want …
-
comment
Comment #48789439
Such a spec would never survive contact with reality. Maybe a human could stumble their way through iterating on it with the help of an LLM, but with current models you’re going to…
-
comment
Comment #48788843
Not really, in such large companies there's enormous selection pressure favoring career politicians. Maybe some of the survivors did some engineering at one point, but expertise fa…
-
comment
Comment #48769139
Yup look at the rest of their comments
-
comment
Comment #48756343
I think it’s the opposite. The _distrust itself_ was pushed by those looking to stir up outrage, generate engagement, and turn it into votes. Case in point: look at all the people …
-
comment
Comment #48726672
Please no. The author would be advised to write their own original thoughts.
-
comment
Comment #48701676
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48694167
What positions did you hear and conclude were baseless?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48624523
I don’t disagree. It’s dehumanizing, and they have a legitimate complaint. In almost any other context I’d be on the side of the workers here. I just have a hard time seeing Meta e…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48624383
It’s a bit hard to feel sympathetic here. Those signing this petition actively enable and profit from one of the most pervasive surveillance networks ever built. Funny how much eas…
-
comment
Comment #48604636
Classic. So tell me how I can just not deal with the credit bureaus? Or tax filing companies? Or any site that sells my data to adtech, without totally secluding myself from the mo…
-
comment
Comment #48604344
> they'll find a way to verify age by themselves. Yeah, by outsourcing it to some shady company that sells all your private info to the lowest bidder. See Discord for example.
-
comment
Comment #48577586
Antitrust enforcement.
-
comment
Comment #48577087
Look at the macro data. The overall median wage for all American workers combined has also drastically lagged behind economic productivity since the 70s.