Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — brasic

brasic

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 08, 2013, 3:15 PM UTC
HN karma
474
Public activity
115 items

About brasic

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #39103283

    The web-flow signing system is for users’ convenience in places where it’s not feasible to sign the commit with their own private key: commits made in the web interface or on an ep…

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #38297897

    The research you do in that scenario would just tell you the prices which shares had actually changed hands at. A decentralized market-based price discovery mechanism cannot be con…

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #36830772

    > but you still need a Personal Access Token to integrate pull requests and issues with your Git client (Nitpick from a former GH employee) PATs really are almost exclusively inten…

  6. comment
    Comment #36830650

    Thanks for the links! I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that “E2E” doesn’t mean much for a meta service.

  7. comment
    Comment #36830594

    Yep, to be clear I was agreeing with lolinder. I would have posted top level but they had already expressed almost exactly my objection to the article so I replied to avoid redunda…

  8. comment
    Comment #36829650

    It sounds almost exactly like the mechanics of a session cookie as implemented on nearly every website on earth. Exchange a password for a bearer credential that is randomly chosen…

  9. comment
    Comment #36828688

    “Please read my rant about how this useless hair-shirt I wear to clear first party cookies too often breaks the web (for me)” > the web has no notion of a “device”, and this is a v…

  10. comment
    Comment #36826047

    Mr. President, we must not allow a mutant AI super soldier gap!

  11. comment
    Comment #36801881

    It doesn’t show as flagged for me. Time heals all wounds, if your comment is not objectionable it will usually be vouched for eventually. Which is one of the reasons it’s a rule he…

  12. comment
    Comment #36801485

    What do you mean? WhatsApp rolled out E2E encryption between 2014 and 2016. It’s by far the largest messaging service that is e2e encrypted by default. I think it’s more than fair …

  13. comment
    Comment #36801030

    Process separation was already in place. The PKCS#11 library is loaded by a long lived helper process, not ssh-agent itself. > (Note to the curious readers: for security reasons, a…

  14. comment
    Comment #36796539

    How would this even be mitigated while preserving the (wacky) existing support for runtime-selected PKCS#11 provider libraries? It strikes me that the most compatible way might be …

  15. comment
    Comment #36794212

    Pre-acquisition WhatsApp was built using Erlang and had an impressively large user-to-server ratio IIRC. I expect that since then things have mostly been rebuilt to use existing me…

  16. comment
    Comment #36790135

    Glad to see a custom merge driver being used here - they’re one of the most powerful of git’s obscure features. Large teams working on a monorepo inevitably start noticing that par…

  17. comment
    Comment #36655799

    From OP: > Now with all those aptitude training [...] that require you to turn on your webcam They are referring to an automated personality or skills test to screen candidates. Th…

  18. comment
    Comment #36631719

    The conflation of “spyware” ie tracking for monetization purposes with telemetry used by developers to ensure the health of production systems is foolish and harmful. Homebrew is a…

  19. comment
    Comment #36626263

    I assume OP was referring to “source available” schemes where the source is published or sometimes selectively disclosed but not licensed for anything other than review, ie you lac…

  20. comment
    Comment #36626025

    I’ve done nothing of the sort. As I said throughout this thread, the injunction prohibits any communications based on a vague and subjective content or motive between a group of ap…

  21. comment
    Comment #36624435

    The actual letter is here: https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1677027980940398599 edit: It looks like this was already submitted and I missed it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #36620530

    Adding a list of carve outs doesn’t make the ban ok.

  24. comment
    Comment #36617655

    Thank you. The real issue here is a small number of companies have become the defacto gatekeepers of a large amount of public discourse. That’s a major problem that this debate is …

  25. comment
    Comment #36617463

    A narrowly tailored prohibition on specific speech aimed at specific government officials may be permissable in some cases. This injunction is carelessly worded to apply to million…