Viewing profile — avazhi
avazhi
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 07, 2022, 2:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 774
- Public activity
- 619 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About avazhi
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49132056
> You'd admit that large grocery chains do have high profits right? Even with "razor thin" margins. Large grocery outlets do love to claim that their margins are razor thin yet som…
-
comment
Comment #49131568
Not the person you're replying to. I'm white/non Jewish, and I have a law degree and work in the legal industry. My post history is 'wide open'. Under no definition of genocide (as…
-
comment
Comment #49122050
Western models censor just as much shit as the Chinese models do, big guy, it’s just different material. While we should be pushing for universal fully uncensored models, this comm…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49119008
Why would any of us care what people 200 or 500 years in the future think of us? Peak irrelevance.
-
comment
Comment #49118986
Probably because food and agriculture (in the region that produces a quarter of America’s domestic food supply) are required for life, while data centers aren’t?
-
comment
Comment #49108322
I couldn’t care less about children or about what is ultimately a parenting issue (keep your fucking kids off the internet). A problem that affects a subset of the population is no…
-
comment
Comment #49019256
Kagi is great, but it's twice as expensive as I think it would have to be for me to feel like I'm actually getting good value for it, unfortunately.
-
comment
Comment #49010033
And? Nobody cares. This is neither a controversy nor news, and that would be the case even if Anthropic hadn’t just settled a 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit where they trained Claude o…
-
comment
Comment #48993174
That’s not what frontier means. There are two frontier labs - OpenAI and Anthropic, and maybe 4 frontier models currently. That term refers to model capacity and in general represe…
-
comment
Comment #48988168
Surveillance no, but potentially being banned, yes. Reddit is Exhibit A for this for me when I think about how I used to use it versus how I use it today. I wish Musk was actually …
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48975572
The irony of this article that was originally posted completely free on The Conversation being stuck behind a Fortune paywall is a bit much. https://theconversation.com/when-can-a-…
-
comment
Comment #48975116
If what you are saying were true, I could rank anything high by simply putting everything actually higher than it in rank into one named set and then turn around and say that the t…
-
comment
Comment #48975019
I'll come back to this - it's been awhile since I studied it and a cursory examination of my old notes has me spotting some misconceptions on my part as expressed here; at the very…
-
comment
Comment #48974118
> the goal of this particular section were to maximize what authors and inventors can extract from their creations then explicitly assigning to them the property rights in perpetui…
-
comment
Comment #48973341
Interesting how you’ve chosen to interpret that section. When I was in law school we were taught what seemed obvious then and is obvious now: that Congress has the power to promote…
-
comment
Comment #48946843
Either think and write for yourself or stay silent next time. It'd be infinitely better than telling another person to use an LLM to understand something you yourself don't underst…
-
comment
Comment #48941462
Nah that’s not how that works. There are literally an endless stream of examples of the model providers tweaking backend stuff and improving prompt responses without using new or r…
-
comment
Comment #48941114
That’s not what second means in this context in English, and it’s incorrect to use it that way. This is because for something to be second there must have been something in first a…
-
comment
Comment #48941003
I used fable more than a month ago, what are you talking about?
-
comment
Comment #48918450
Documenting offences? What offences would those be? It isn’t an offence to record somebody on a train or else the person who recorded the video of the guy also committed an offence…
-
comment
Comment #48848003
What does that have to do with whether or not this should be on HN? By your logic, literally anything from the '80s is appropriate for this site, which is obviously not correct lol…
-
comment
Comment #48847624
> Anything that gratifies intellectual curiosity And no matter your view on the subject, a pop singer dying is not a topic that is capable of gratifying intellectual curiosity. It'…