Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — anarchotroll

anarchotroll

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 03, 2011, 7:23 AM UTC
HN karma
15
Public activity
34 items

About anarchotroll

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #10382727

    Oops! The high density of comments criticizing capitalism made me misinterpret what you had said. My bad.

  2. comment
    Comment #10377652

    Do you believe we would be better off if we destroyed/prohibited all the technological innovations you mentioned in your comment? Stop for a moment and think about that. Then, read…

  3. comment
    Comment #10377632

    If the so called "evil wealthy people" control all the machines that produce goods and services, what would they use those goods and services for, since the rest of the world is mi…

  4. comment
    Comment #5509232

    Copying with pentadactyl using Y shows exactly what has been copied on the status line at the bottom of the screen.

  5. comment
    Comment #5506428

    Lockheed had been working with D-Wave for a while. If they decided to actually buy one of their computers, this probably means that they liked what they were seeing.

  6. comment
    Comment #5433365

    Is there something that prevents you from starting your own company?

  7. comment
    Comment #5430742

    He says he dislikes a private system but, at the same time, indirectly acknowledges that what makes the system at his district work is the fact that it is partly private. It is par…

  8. comment
    Comment #5419121

    *hate himself

  9. comment
    Comment #5413499

    I really don't understand what makes someone do something for 4 years that he or she clearly dislikes. He must hate his himself.

  10. comment
    Comment #5366124

    Humans will always figure out a way to combine the resources they have to generate additional value. It doesn't matter if these resources are wood, sand, oil, water, steel or softw…

  11. comment
    Comment #5334338

    Seems like the big confusion about the controller is that it is closer to a ViewModel (think MVVM) than to a Controller itself. Potatos, Potahtos.

  12. comment
    Comment #4368384

    The bottom line is: everything that cannot be scientifically proved acquires this sort of "religous" attributes. No wonder religions and politics are like that

  13. comment
    Comment #4365428

    What he wrote about Microsoft is completely unrelated to the rest of his post. It says nothing about the company's culture and software development processes. He could have saved h…

  14. comment
    Comment #4217374

    The cons mentioned in the article above aren't Ruby cons per se, they are shared by all dynamic languages.

  15. comment
    Comment #4154337

    It kinda sucks that you still have to declare an interface in order to pass functions around.

  16. comment
    Comment #3755282

    Do you guys know a productivity application that monitors app usage and keystrokes?

  17. comment
    Comment #3747101

    C#, the language, is not windows centric. The framework released by microsoft might be, but the language itself is decoupled from windows.

  18. comment
    Comment #3747073

    I also feel like "Funcs" are a work around. What I like the most about C# is the fact that it keeps evolving and incorporating new paradigms (closures, lambdas, LINQ, etc)

  19. comment
    Comment #3712864

    You shouldn't be proud of having 1 gazillion tests if all you do is rewrite/fix regressions on them.

  20. comment
    Comment #3712856

    Bottom line is: test code is code and you have to maintain it. If you write code that does not give you anything in return, or gives you more headaches than anything else, you wast…

  21. comment
    Comment #3712833

    And how often did you have to rewrite those tests because you were drastically changing the architecture of your code? Do you think the effort of maintaining all those tests might …

  22. comment
    Comment #3712792

    Exactly. The computer will just repeat what you tell it to do. There is the chance that you will tell it wrong (a bug in your test code), and the chance that what you told it is no…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #3712777

    You can never actually guarantee anything even if you have tests. The tests will only increase the likelihood of catching regressions.

  25. comment
    Comment #3702097

    How many of those 17% are illegal immigrants? Do you have that data?