Viewing profile — Weltan
Weltan
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 20, 2013, 5:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Weltan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6639997
Yeah, asking why you do something is as much a question about an action as asking whether you'd do it. You're not asking "Would you pay it?" you're asking: "Would you pay it if con…
-
comment
Comment #6639913
Is that the correct test, though? Ask the guy if he would take the job if he wasn't starving: He'll say 'No'. So in a system where he has no recourse to some safety net, he's not a…
-
comment
Comment #6639852
On a legal conception (my field), people don't pay taxes because they are forced to do so by force, people pay taxes for a wide variety of reasons: fear of consequences, habit, act…
-
comment
Comment #6639738
I don't see this 'larger implication'. Where is this objective moral scale I can look at? The one that'll tell me that I'm more moral than you, or you're more moral than me? I don'…
-
comment
Comment #6639697
Did I say that? I didn't realize I made such a categorical statement! I thought I said that the market already takes the government into account, not that the government cannot be …
-
comment
Comment #6638479
Then where/how/why does this 'evaluation' you speak of happen?
-
comment
Comment #6638279
The market is a system constantly re-evaluating itself to reach equilibrium. It's a very weak view of the market which takes away from it the ability to take into account governmen…
-
comment
Comment #6638210
Yeah, but such a statement requires no actual evidence. I can tell you I'm okay with it, because that's a fact about myself. The fact that your view is incompatible just shows that…
-
comment
Comment #6634655
Right, and I guess what I'm saying is that it's fine to do so at someone else's expense. But that's the moral argument and it's a simple one, I don't see government force as illegi…
-
comment
Comment #6634520
I didn't say we have to evaluate the cost in any sort of vacuum of political power, the tools are here and the tools are perfectly capable of taking into account government. In fac…
-
comment
Comment #6634470
So there's no room in this case where and individual would be unable to find work? Somehow, everyone will have a skill-set and the personal capability (even quadriplegic people?) a…
-
comment
Comment #6634329
Are you suggesting that in a society without a government there would be no unemployment? (To clarify, unemployment is the opposite of employment. Unemployment is 'not working'.) O…
-
comment
Comment #6634256
I'm aware of the strange views of Libertarians, but I'd never heard a currency itself marked as coercive! I agree: It's a strange view of coercion where getting fired and ending up…
-
comment
Comment #6634218
I see, so a coercive currency is just fiat currency (or just currency) with an appended modifier. This modifier itself is then qualified with 'indirect' because the regulations ena…
-
comment
Comment #6634060
What is a coercive currency and which economists suggest it?
-
comment
Comment #6579834
They're not obligated to do so, but they do have the right to do so. The name Mario is not a trademark itself since common names cannot be trademarked, although product names conta…
-
comment
Comment #6116780
The real solution is single-payer, a public option may have eased transition into single-payer sometime in the future, whereas a sudden transition into single-payer would have shoc…
-
comment
Comment #6116491
That's one of the reasons why subsidising and regulating private health insurance is not a good approach. If the government worked the way it was supposed to (rationally), then the…
-
comment
Comment #5910423
The right system is the one which gives the judge a discretion as to who pays costs, guided by court rules as well as economic sense and equitable principles.