Viewing profile — ShirtlessRod

> To get something that works better. Despite all evidence to the contrary.

From the article it sounded like it wasn't just "who is this person we would like to question them", it was more along the lines of "we need access to this person's email and other…

There's a lot of misinformation to unpack here. Your information is definitely out of date.

What "update process" are you referring to? Claims processing?

They already have an option like that. The problem is a lot of organizations still want to do their own thing or have their own requirements they want to impose on their users, whi…

That's because the organization requires their docs to file data in that way; it's not a requirement or limitation of the software at all. You're basically saying that software can…

I fundamentally disagree with the idea that the system can somehow overcome poor implementation; guardrails can only do so much. At the end of the day you can set up almost any pie…

I'm not really sure what to say to that, since you seem to be implying that no one likes it, which is pretty patently false. A lot of it does depend on the organization you're work…

That's a pretty pessimistic and quite frankly not accurate assessment of the software. They have a ton of clinical functionality, and that's what the majority of the dev/design spe…

How is it "garbage software"?

All of these things can be done without internet connectivity.

https://westinghouse.com/electronics/

Didn't you read? "Some people", the most pernicious of all groups.

Solid argument, especially after throwing around insults instead of discussing (or refuting) the points brought up in the original comment.

True, but I would guess that oil is used at a much higher rate than sand, especially considering the relative availability of each.

Seems like he could have easily had the meeting in a private conference room, where no one would be eavesdropping. Then he could have quickly and calmly explained the situation to …

I'm not sure. I've been lucky enough to not have to worry about it, but I've definitely seen it (mostly of the "stalker" variety) and can easily understand why someone would want t…

Then you've never had a bad run-in with someone who was decidedly unhinged.

My favorite part: "The technology, which the agency has used since at least 2008, relies on a covert channel of radio waves that can be transmitted from tiny circuit boards and USB…

Why would you smirk at people who eat lunch?

"I would expect" "Hopefully" Good enough for me!

I'm very happy for you that you feel that you not in a position where that is a risky step. Are you able to fathom that others may not be in that same situation, or are you content…

"Given enough effort" is the key there. Just because someone can break into your house given enough effort doesn't mean you leave your doors off the hinges.

For people that have rational minds. What about people who are irrational or have some sort of mental illness? I guess that's just a "too bad" for the person who is now dead?

It sounds like you're saying that the ends justify the means.