Viewing profile — PunchyHamster

Does US know it ? Coz it certainly acts like one for most part of the war

I mean it worked fine for 50 years, surely it will work fine for another 50

But cars do have that level of reliability, in ECU (sans hardware I guess, still flash memory). It's just everything else around is ass

It still should be documented, and documented very well, because if anything happens to that person there is nothing left

It's still funny how their docs are such a mess even AI gets lost in them

AGI might be a risk but what top AI firms are doing is not really getting us closer to AGI in a meaningful way, it is pretty clear now LLM is not the way to get there

IBM's business is still going so I dunno what your point is

because for most use cases FIPS-140 have been waste of time for everyone involved

different kind of AI

I used Claude code that I pointed at local Kroki instance for rendering, and made it note how to use it in CLAUDE.md for validating

the article kinda ignores that the direction of mowing matters, optimal path would look shit

The thing is that if you do it "right" (screen usage, correct when it is needed), it probably won't be noticed as AI in the first place.

Diagram-wise I had better luck in telling it to make a text version for diagram generator, not only AI edits tend to be more correct, it's easier to fix any errors too. As a bonus …

It's weird to observe that trend in house decor, first it was mark of wealth, after that when cheaper methods to replicate the look (and some might be even more smooth than doing i…

It can be true tho. You might be genuinely skilled in one domain and realize the extent of your skill, while being over-confident in one you have little experience. I also noticed …

Most people don't own their IP range so it's moot point to support it.

protests you from: having some free time for more important things doesn't protect you from: anything, users will get phished by domain anyway, and the spammers/scammer send DMARCe…

if the tool isn't ran it can't be exploited CVE should just be far more granular instead of flagging alert for anything using zlib

...what, that's terrible advice. If you gonna waste time on that just waste time on writing the code from scratch

"Trust but verify" and "Locks keep honest people honest" Some people might be absolutely moral, but most just don't want to experience consequences

Turns out it's far easier to do stuff if you are in control of every single level.

TF is even this >Thanks to this, an administrator seeing the string 123456/QUSER/QZDASOINIT immediately knows who and what launched it, without having to map mysterious PID numbers…

Feels like where Mozilla went

> Are we saying that it's now a problem that we're not getting scraped? No, it is saying that even the ones that are being scraped are not being included in results

They probably also sent AI on bug hunting quest there too like they were bragging for Chrome...