Viewing profile — MikkoFinell
MikkoFinell
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 04, 2016, 6:27 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 257
- Public activity
- 198 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MikkoFinell
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17230447
As good a time as any to quit HN I suppose.
-
comment
Comment #17220179
I asked why OP is dismissing the possibility that the authors considered the specific factors OP mentioned. The quote you posted did not address that question. That is why it is no…
-
comment
Comment #17220147
LOL, what are you talking about? I asked why OP had such a dismissive attitude towards the original paper, and that's "researcher worship"? Gotta be one of the most toxic responses…
-
comment
Comment #17220112
What gave you the idea that I was making a scientific argument?
-
comment
Comment #17219061
The quote you copy-pasted from the article has nothing to do with my comment.
-
comment
Comment #17218943
So you were able to think of a couple confounding factors off the top of your head, but you dismiss the idea that the researchers had considered those factors and controlled for it…
-
comment
Comment #17218813
With no disrespect to Dabney, but these kinds of obituaries make HN kind of morbid in my opinion.
-
comment
Comment #17185868
I'm satisfied with Cinnamon. If any dev happens to read this: thank you and keep up the good work, it's appreciated.
-
comment
Comment #17176648
> what's gravity got to do with it? Gravity got the following to do with it: Lower gravity makes it easier for the atmosphere to escape to space, especially since Mars has a very w…
-
comment
Comment #17176598
> If we nuked the polar ice caps (or similar method to warm + evaporate them) it would generate enough of an atmosphere for the external pressure to be livable - maybe even breatha…
-
comment
Comment #17176388
You can't really terraform Mars either, not enough gravity. And even if it was possible, the amount of work required to bring the air there is orders of magnitude more than simply …
-
comment
Comment #17176213
Why don't they just write the network stack in Rust? Then we would know it's secure with no audit required.
-
comment
Comment #17175996
Sorry but I don't see how that follows from my logic at all. Would you please care to clarify how you reached that conclusion starting from some assumption I made?
-
comment
Comment #17175982
So allowing Mexican cartels to smuggle and sell, for example, heroin has a positive economic effect on society? I have to admit that's a fresh perspective.
-
comment
Comment #17172513
I meant the effects of fever, so that perhaps different parts of the brain was affected differently by the temperature increase. I really have no idea, but I was saying that it is …
-
comment
Comment #17172180
I'm not saying that filtration theory is false, I'm saying it seems less likely to me than the following alternative: The chemical composition of a sober persons brain causes us to…
-
comment
Comment #17171921
No hadn't seen it.
-
comment
Comment #17171911
Okay so damaging the neurotransmitters (filters) should create a more psychedelic experience for that person. I find that unlikely.
-
comment
Comment #17171903
I agree that fever and lack of sleep can produce hallucinations, but I'm not convinced that they are non-localized effects in the brain, nor that psychedelic chemicals are non-loca…
-
comment
Comment #17171806
If the hypothesis was true, we would expect the effects of brain damage to reliably create a richer and more psychedelic experience for the sufferer. Hallucinations and paranoia ar…
-
comment
Comment #17170745
The problem is the theory implies that people with brain damage should experience psychological effects similar to those induced by psychedelic drugs, and we don't see anything lik…
-
comment
Comment #17167754
Why not?
-
comment
Comment #17167698
Suppose they are smuggling narcotics.
-
comment
Comment #17166602
> Furthermore even though these lasers are very cheap, by army norms, to fire, they're still 600$ or so for a single shot. So shooting down drones will be expensive. Far more expen…
-
comment
Comment #17162789
I hope you're right.