Viewing profile — JasonADrury

The blog post was written by AI. "luxury" is one of the adjectives AI likes to use a lot.

> The DDoS is pretty obviously ridiculous, completely unacceptable, and entirely indefensible, while the blog post seems like whatever The DDoS hasn't even successfully taken the w…

Where did I ever argue that? It's obviously not "a-ok". It's just "meh", a silly childish tantrum.

[dead]

>the way Jason Drury shifts from “tried to dox” to “doxx’d” I double-checked all my comments, that never happened.

>The weird part to me is that some people are seemingly trying to downplay a popular website abusing visitors to DDoS someone. What's the true, practical impact being downplayed he…

Nonsense, by the mid-aughts google searches and whois lookups were key tools for doxing. If you had been around in the hacker scene at that time, you'd be well aware instead of try…

We called this exact pattern of behaviour "doxing" on IRC in the early 2000s, I really don't know why you think I'm using some new definition. It's probable that in the later 00s t…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Ulysses is not enjoyable.

You've caught me!

Of course attempting to dox someone is an attack.

Right, yes, because the people doing this totally don't know that they're breaking the law?

>Also documenting who funds a service is in the public interest. Not really, no. It's not unlikely to result in the service ceasing to exist.

I think the DDoS is clearly problematic, I just don't think it's problematic because it's criminal. It's problematic because it's childish and pointlessly degrades the user experie…

Archive.org has an even worse history of this, FWIW. It allows website owners and third parties to tamper with archived content. Look here, for example: https://web.archive.org/web…

I don't see how this description changes the fundamental nature of your actions. Even a half-assed attempt at doxing is still an attempt at doxing. It'd be much easier to accept th…

I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.today Easy stuff, no?

I suggest you double-check that. Archive.today/archive.is is the one which bypasses paywalls and makes unreadable content readable, not archive.org

[flagged]

Defamation? No. Doxing? Yes. It's clear that the person running archive.today does not actively publicize their identity. > As far as I read the tone of the post is full of admirat…

So far, the only sin archive.today has been accused of is retaliating against a guy attempting to dox them. That's a pretty small sin in my book. To be written off as wildly unsucc…

Jani Patokallio who runs gyrovague.com published a blog post attempting to dox the owner of archive.today. Jani justifies his doxing as follows "I found it curious that we know so …

The purpose of a thing is what it does.