Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — CKN23-ARIN

CKN23-ARIN

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 8:11 AM UTC
HN karma
270
Public activity
106 items

About CKN23-ARIN

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #28857786

    URL is currently showing as http://index.html/ Correct URL: https://toonk.io/ipv4-sale-wide-and-apnic-selling-43-8/index... I tried to re-submit with the correct URL, but it got er…

  2. story
  3. story
  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #26349856

    It's at least somewhat inherent to the technology. DOCSIS download channels are shared among subscribers; upload channels are allocated exclusively per-subscriber. This architectur…

  6. comment
    Comment #26349768

    It's asymmetric, providing far less upload capacity than download.

  7. comment
    Comment #26348908

    The letter specifically calls for symmetrical speeds of at least 100Mbps. Let's hope that this is the death of PON-based FTTH.

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #25406663

    Jealous! I pay ARIN hundreds of dollars a year in RSA fees. As a legacy address holder, how do you feel about RPKI?

  10. comment
    Comment #25397712

    There are five regulatory bodies managing it. Six, if you count IANA. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/allocation-ipv4-rirs-2... https://afrinic.net/policy/manual https://www.…

  11. comment
    Comment #25397581

    I think we'll still see some people doing NAT66, unfortunately.

  12. comment
    Comment #25397503

    Autonomous System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_(Internet)

  13. comment
    Comment #25397470

    The exception to this is a handful of remaining "legacy" pre-RIR address holders. I'm surprised AWS, etc. are so willingly handing the addresses they buy from legacy holders over t…

  14. comment
    Comment #25397412

    What kind of entities does your broker rent them out to? Are you worried at all about tenants trashing your IPs' reputation and future market value?

  15. comment
    Comment #25396549

    The smallest routable IPv4 network on the Internet is a /24, which is 256 addresses. Regional Internet Registries won't assign you smaller than a /24, but individual ISPs might. Ev…

  16. comment
    Comment #25396350

    Some carriers are engaging in IPv6-only peering spats, which is also harming adoption. Cogent, recipient (and rejector) of the famous Peering Cake[1], has no IPv6 routes to Google …

  17. comment
    Comment #25396299

    They're still expanding their IPv4 holdings, and IPv6 support would hamper that.

  18. comment
  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #25269968

    .12c/gbit?? I need to renegotiate my transit bill...

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #24989256

    Which will, in turn, result in a higher likelihood of similar bugs in the future.

  23. comment
    Comment #24913523

    AWS and Azure prevent Iran-based users from having an account, but if you have an account, you can exchange traffic with Iranian IPs. GCP blocks traffic to/from Iranian IPs for all…

  24. comment
    Comment #24893066

    Other than GCP, which US based cloud providers do this?

  25. comment
    Comment #24892124

    > The internet is not a parallel universe. John Perry Barlow begs to differ. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence