Viewing profile — Bakingpotato
Bakingpotato
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 9:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 44
- Public activity
- 37 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Bakingpotato
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36915569
it looks all the files are unmodified, no nothing seems ported they're probably using a ruffle implementation
-
comment
Comment #36915552
I guess the one to step in is Ruffle
-
comment
Comment #36915532
I don't think Ruffle is HTML5. something about Web assembly and rust?
-
comment
Comment #36915527
yeah, pretty much. they're even making new ones, too
-
comment
Comment #36915523
true, I guess thats why Ruffle is so popular now
-
comment
Comment #36915517
for sure. what with people making new flash stuff for the NG flash jams and all. thank goodness for Ruffle.
-
comment
Comment #36915513
if it ever decides to work, lmao.
-
comment
Comment #36915501
you can spoof URLs on the Ruffle desktop player, but not using the extension
-
comment
Comment #36915495
Ruffle isn't a reverse engineered project, from what I can tell. it seems like they're following some spec, and comparing with the flash player, not decomping it
-
comment
Comment #36915480
Ruffle has been getting pretty good. Lots of customization. I hope they can improve the performance at some point, and keep all the options.
-
comment
Comment #36915467
There's a reason you don't see too many HTML gaming websites, it itsn't that great for games, as much as they would like it to be.
-
comment
Comment #36915458
Absolutely. Get the authoring software, (I hear a certain animate archive has them) and post to NG like all the Flash forward jammers have Ruffle works wonders
-
comment
Comment #36915446
you can spoof URLs on the Ruffle desktop player, but not using the extension
-
comment
Comment #36732552
that's true. I think a few flash games did a split swf thing for DRM purposes, and yeah. look where that got them... lost media ahoy for html5
-
comment
Comment #36732528
while that might be true, its probably more true that they want to own the internet (see: nonstandard changes within chrome, forcibly making chromium dominant, the AMP debacle) and…
-
comment
Comment #36732163
now that is the real flaw of flash, and the most overlooked bit. all the while people (and adobe) were making login pages and security within flash (which is insane, you don't use …
-
comment
Comment #36731867
and then adobe spit on all of it. what a waste, and its all on adobe.
-
comment
Comment #36731858
nah, HTML5 was and still isn't good enough for a straight conversion, as years of flash ""alternatives"" have shown us.
-
comment
Comment #36731845
less rose tinted glasses and more the insanity of people entrusting logins and security to flash player to start with, or even adobe for adding that in. Yknow. if it was riddled wi…
-
comment
Comment #36731829
>adobe didn't want to pay for rewrites or bugfixes yeah, its a wonder they ever bought it to start with, then you don't just buy someone's entire workflow and then not fix any of i…
-
comment
Comment #36730557
oh god, autodesk. don't remind me. exactly correct.
-
comment
Comment #36730523
not only that, the shovelware scene proved that it was piss easy to use, and powerful (especially in the later years) see as many html5 gaming webpages lately? yeah, no. the 'death…
-
comment
Comment #36730400
yeah I remember that people demonized flash so much for that and turned a blind eye once html and javascript was given that power. jokes on them now, I guess not to mention flash c…
-
comment
Comment #36730374
yeah, a lot of flash content that was SVG exclusive can go up past 4k and look stunning, and flash was the only one around then (and debatably, now) with an editor to let someone l…
-
comment
Comment #36730361
adobe was the death of flash. Macromedia had a better handle on it, and when adobe bought it, then ran it into the floor and gave up early, leaving it to rot. I don't think they co…