Live data from Hacker News

Firechat and nearby communication

breizh-entropy.org

1–10 of 29 posts

Re: Firechat and nearby communication

#4
Despite what the author continually says, the interface does not say "Real Name" in the author's screenshots. As far as I have heard, no one has been prevented from having an account due to a "Real Name" policy. This is in stark contrast to Facebook, the major player in the "Real Name" game.

I don't like Firechat requiring a signup, but the facts of what is required should not be confused. Pseudonymous use appears to be accepted.

Re: Firechat and nearby communication

#5

I downloaded this a few months back hoping that in NYC there would be enough user density to make it useful, but it seems I was too early. Interesting use case that protesting would be using it.

Would definitely be interesting to see it being used for entertainment purposes. But it appears its a "last resort" kind of app, especially with Hong Kong's situation.

If people are growing more and more concerned with privacy that could be the nudge. Or if they offered something standard SMS cannot (speed, feature, etc.)

Re: Firechat and nearby communication

#10

Something I don't understand: can someone explain why FireChat needs an account when it doesn't require internet access?

I believe an accounts basically stores your public key on their servers, so other people can verify with FireChat who it is that sent the message.

In an offline context, you'd be able to get a lot of messages and tell that it's the same person talking, but you'll have no way to see whether that really is the person or not. FireChat's public key servers allow those with access to see- according to FireChat- who is talking.

Post reply on HN