Firechat and nearby communication
breizh-entropy.org
Firechat and nearby communication
1–10 of 29 posts
Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#2Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#3Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#4I don't like Firechat requiring a signup, but the facts of what is required should not be confused. Pseudonymous use appears to be accepted.
Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#5I downloaded this a few months back hoping that in NYC there would be enough user density to make it useful, but it seems I was too early. Interesting use case that protesting would be using it.
If people are growing more and more concerned with privacy that could be the nudge. Or if they offered something standard SMS cannot (speed, feature, etc.)
Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#6Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#7As an open source alternative, have a look at the Project Serval http://www.servalproject.org/
Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#8Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#9Re: Firechat and nearby communication
#10Something I don't understand: can someone explain why FireChat needs an account when it doesn't require internet access?
In an offline context, you'd be able to get a lot of messages and tell that it's the same person talking, but you'll have no way to see whether that really is the person or not. FireChat's public key servers allow those with access to see- according to FireChat- who is talking.