Live data from Hacker News

Is Dvorak a Professional Troll?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 47 posts

Is Dvorak a Professional Troll?

#1
After John Dvorak accused Vivek Kundra of being a phony, Tim Oreilly shortly afterward tweeted a link to a youtube video of John "explaining how he lies to get controversy" http://twitter.com/timoreilly/status/3271565056 and later stating that he is "trolling for traffic" http://twitter.com/timoreilly/status/3272103221 Dvorak responded that this was an ad hominem attack http://twitter.com/THErealDVORAK/status/3280289449 The question is still bugging me, Is he a professional troll?

Some virology podcasters were recently irked that he uses a podcast with a big audience to spread H1N1 hysteria.

Full podcast episode: http://www.twiv.tv/2009/08/09/twiv-44-no-hysteria/

Dvorak clip: snippet: http://susdomestica.posterous.com/no-agenda-equals-no-knowledge

(I debated whether this is Hacker News worthy but decided to submit for discussion either way as up/down votes will answer this question)

Re: Is Dvorak a Professional Troll?

#4

Yes.

I believe he is. However, I believe a lot of news organizations/blog owners are trying to do it these days. They will have very controversial/eye catching headlines with no substance in the article to gain more traction. Dvorak is a few steps ahead, he tries to justify those headlines by pulling fake data.

Re: Is Dvorak a Professional Troll?

#10
post #7

Can't the same thing be said about people like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter? They twist and turn facts, drum up controversy and spread hate/fear.

Oh, definitely. But they might not be trolling on purpose; there is the off chance that they actually believe the stuff they're saying.
Post reply on HN