No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: undefined
#2Why use JS if you are benchmarking?
Re: undefined
#3[dead]
Re: undefined
#4Re: undefined
#5[deleted]
Re: undefined
#6https://archive.ph/C12zw
Sloppy article, and the performance benchmark it’s built on is a year old - all three engines have had meaningful changes since.
Re: undefined
#7[deleted]
Re: undefined
#8This is an AI generated wrapper blog post for the real article:
https://hackernoon.com/myth-vs-reality-real-world-runtime-pe...
It provides a bit of extra context on startup times and install times of dependencies but I wouldn't trust those given the automated nature of the articles creation.
Re: undefined
#9If you’re trying to compare three runtimes, what’s the point of using completely different frameworks on each of them?
How do I know that all the differences aren’t because of that?
Re: undefined
#10If you’re trying to compare three runtimes, what’s the point of using completely different frameworks on each of them? How do I know that all the differences aren’t because of that?
The website is down, but another commenter linked the original article[0]. Seems their reasoning is:
> For each runtime, the fastest available web framework was selected to ensure optimal performance
But I agree. Best thing to do is use the same framework.
[0] https://hackernoon.com/myth-vs-reality-real-world-runtime-pe...