No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: undefined
#2Bit of an inflammatory title, no Starlink satellites were destroyed (nor is it the same technology since it's much further away).
China has successfully transmitted data at 1 gigabit per second (Gbps) from a geostationary orbit using a 2-watt laser
Re: undefined
#3Bit of an inflammatory title, no Starlink satellites were destroyed (nor is it the same technology since it's much further away). China has successfully transmitted data at 1 gigabit per second (Gbps) from a geostationary orbit using a 2-watt laser
[deleted]
Re: undefined
#4From a geostationary orbit...
Speed of light and all that. I know someone who uses a VoIP softphone over a traditional, geostationary satellite, internet connection. It's awful. The round trip time is so long you practically have to say "over" and "over and out" to control the conversation flow.
The key thing about starlink isn't just the bandwidth. It's the latency, because the satellites aren't that far away.
Re: undefined
#5Bit of an apples to hamburgers comparison here, while it's an interesting technical achievement it's pretty much zero threat to starlink. Even if you set aside the latency issue with geostationary laser links aren't going to be practical solution for providing internet to the general public.