Untitled topic
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: undefined
#2Re: undefined
#3[flagged]
Re: undefined
#4Re: undefined
#5Re: undefined
#6Re: undefined
#7all models but one failed completely. only grok made a version that was several orders of magnitude slower than the lib which uWrap bests by 10x, which he considered a small win. but when he checked what it used as a reference, it turned out that uWrap is what it had pulled from the web. so it very poorly regurgitated my lib.
i guess i dont need look for a new career just yet.
Re: undefined
#8Re: undefined
#9tl;dr: LLM struggle to write performant/correct code unless you use codeflash. The "trick" is that you run tests/benchmarks against the generated code. It is not clear whether codeflash does that for you, or you have to write your tests/benchmarks and then codeflash runs a loop trying different versions while testing against your code.
Re: undefined
#10tl;dr: LLM struggle to write performant/correct code unless you use codeflash. The "trick" is that you run tests/benchmarks against the generated code. It is not clear whether codeflash does that for you, or you have to write your tests/benchmarks and then codeflash runs a loop trying different versions while testing against your code.
Hi, I am the creator of Codeflash. The idea is to do everything that a professional performance engineer would do and to automate it. So codeflash, analyzes your code, creates correctness tests, creates performance benchmarking tests, executes these tests to figure out the behavior and performance of code. Along side it also profiles and determines the line coverage of your original code. Then it uses all this info t…