Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
lunduke.locals.com
Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#2Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#3Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#4[flagged]
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#5[flagged]
i think you have it backwards, you miss where the godot community manager has all kinds of hateful nwords rants? and the people who are hateful just have opinions like "how about we focus on the mission"
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#6[flagged]
i think you have it backwards, you miss where the godot community manager has all kinds of hateful nwords rants? and the people who are hateful just have opinions like "how about we focus on the mission"
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
i think you have it backwards, you miss where the godot community manager has all kinds of hateful nwords rants? and the people who are hateful just have opinions like "how about we focus on the mission"
Wasn’t that an unofficial discord server mod, not a Godot community manager
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
i think you have it backwards, you miss where the godot community manager has all kinds of hateful nwords rants? and the people who are hateful just have opinions like "how about we focus on the mission"
I don't have anything backwards. The community manager never said those things.
Re: Godot Responds to Mass Banning – No Apology, Blames Banned Users
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't have anything backwards. The community manager never said those things.
so did they ban this person who went on these nword filled rants from godot communities? or do they support that sort of stuff
You clearly have an agenda with the way you're constructing your statements so let me break this down for you in little itsy bitzy bite sized pieces:
The statements you're referring to were self-referential, so no one is supporting the use of the words AND no one is getting banned for using satirical jokes against themselves. The statements were made by a non-foundation member.
This might be a complicated subject for you to understand, but please know I've tried my very best to make it easy for you.
But hey, if you're really peeved off about it and believe otherwise, it's open source. You can leave if you want to.