Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: GitHub no longer readable without JavaScript

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 79 posts

Re: Tell HN: GitHub no longer readable without JavaScript

#5

Honest question and no pun intended: I don't understand people's desire to prevent JavaScript from being a language that runs in the browser. Could someone shed some light on this?

We love javascript running on the browser. We just want it to be optional. I'm not always using a machine or connection capable of handling today's (or even yesterday's) javascript frameworks. Sometimes I just have a machine that can read HTMl perfectly well, but that's about it.

We believe in hypermedia.

Re: Tell HN: GitHub no longer readable without JavaScript

#7
I think GitHub being an SPA is largely fine, it has good reasons to be in many situations, what I object to is when a shopping site or, even worse, a content site requires JS to work. This seems terrible when serving HTML is a much better experience for most users.

Re: Tell HN: GitHub no longer readable without JavaScript

#8

Honest question and no pun intended: I don't understand people's desire to prevent JavaScript from being a language that runs in the browser. Could someone shed some light on this?

Personally I have nothing against it (or to be more exact - I've given up hope for a Javascript-optional web) but I see the argument of people who keep it disabled because:

– it consumes more battery and bandwidth (the latter still being expensive on mobile in some parts of the world;

– it's often used to track you (including tracking everything you do - mouse movement, things you type into forms without even submitting it, etc.), serve you ads, and so on;

– most security issues (XSS, browser-based 0-day exploits that escape the sandbox) rely on Javascript being turned on

– it overall slows down many pages with no tangible benefit to the user (this one is obviously not always the case, depends on the website).

Post reply on HN