I still don't understand your question ... there are several possible interpretations, and I don't know which one you think is the most obvious.
So here's one.
> There are white balls numbered 1 to 70.
> There are black balls numbered 1 to 25.
> I select 5 white balls uniformly at random without replacement.
> I select 1 black ball uniformly at random.
> I place all the balls in numerical order.
> What is the probability that the black ball is the third smallest?
But that description doesn't really seem to match the language you're using. You talk about "Getting exactly the two smallest white balls right" ... I have no idea what you mean by that. And what part is played by the black "mega" ball?
If my framing is right (though I suspect it isn't) ... the first supplementary question is: What if the selected white balls are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and the black ball is numbered 2?
By the way, the hardest part about these sorts of questions is learned how to state them absolutely precisely. You will find that no matter how careful you are, there will be someone who finds an alternate interpretation. I'm not even convinced my statement above is completely water-tight.
Also, why are you asking? What's your application?
Finally, as I say, I suspect my framing is wrong, and that I really don't understand what you're asking. If you're serious about this, you need to think carefully about what's actually going on, break it down into very small steps, and try to be absolutely precise about each step. So far, I suspect I'm not going to understand your question well enough to be able to answer.