Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#2If they can pull this off – awesome.
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#3Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#4Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#5I guess we will see more skyscrapers then since more density is required.
The giant vacant housing inventories have not gone down much over the years. Cheap housing sells well, but giant mansion apartments that got trendy at around 2012-2015 are really unsellable, and there were really a lot of them built in urban centres.
Believe me or not, Shanghai has few places with 10 years old "brand new" apartments.
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#6I guess we will see more skyscrapers then since more density is required.
See a bit what Le Corbusier was doing with its "Unité d'habitation": A large building that also included amenities and a park around it.
Edit in response to Barry below: Whatever Le Corbusier's faults, "Unité d'habitation" [1] was indeed designed to be pleasant and liveable, and including a school (originally) and a floor for shops and amenities.
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#7> The new urbanisation guidelines encourage mixed-use development and recommend that all residents should have improved access to a diverse range of public and commercial amenities – schools, supermarkets, retirement centers, hospitals, parks, and cultural centers – within range of where they live. There is a special emphasis on green space: the guidelines decree that all city dwellers should have access to public pa…
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#8I guess we will see more skyscrapers then since more density is required.
Well, they are more efficient and free up space so you could have green spaces around them. See a bit what Le Corbusier was doing with its "Unité d'habitation": A large building that also included amenities and a park around it. Edit in response to Barry below: Whatever Le Corbusier's faults, "Unité d'habitation" [1] was indeed designed to be pleasant and liveable, and including a school (originally) and a floor for…
Le Corbusier’s ideal city was something like Brasilia, which he designed. Hostile to pedestrians, made for motorists, with no mixed use spaces anywhere, with residential, commercial and industrial spaces completely separated.
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#9I guess we will see more skyscrapers then since more density is required.
Re: Recommendations from the first meeting of China’s urban policy unit in 38 years
#10I guess we will see more skyscrapers then since more density is required.
The trick with density is all about making those skyscrapers occupied. The giant vacant housing inventories have not gone down much over the years. Cheap housing sells well, but giant mansion apartments that got trendy at around 2012-2015 are really unsellable, and there were really a lot of them built in urban centres. Believe me or not, Shanghai has few places with 10 years old "brand new" apartments.
Getting any place within ten minutes taxi ride of a metro occupied is easy. Might be hard to sell it but you can rent it easy.