Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
blog.stephenwolfram.com
Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
1–10 of 81 posts
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#2Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#3Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#4Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#5Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.
They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people.
Maybe there is some other award recognition?
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#6Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#7As a nice bonus that video will also help you understand the Mandelbrot and Julia sets.
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#8[0] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1461-0248...
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#9Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.
> Nobel Laureate in Physics They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people. Maybe there is some other award recognition?
Edit: 72 years in average across all prizes, although first half of 20th century was lower.
Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…
#10Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.
> Nobel Laureate in Physics They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people. Maybe there is some other award recognition?