Live data from Hacker News

Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

blog.stephenwolfram.com

1–10 of 81 posts

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#2
Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ).

Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#5
post #2

Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.

> Nobel Laureate in Physics

They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people.

Maybe there is some other award recognition?

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#8
One interesting place that period doubling shows up that the article doesn't mention is in population ecology. I'm most familiar with the Tribolium work of Constantino, Dennis, Cushing, and some other folks, which you can read an example of here[0]. Basically, the beetles have three life stages (four, actually - egg, larva, pupa, adult - but adding eggs in the model doesn't increase accuracy any so they leave it out for simplicity), and if you model the respective numbers of adults for a starting number of larvae, you can see truly chaotic behavior, including period doubling. It's fascinating work.

[0] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1461-0248...

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#9
post #5
post #2

Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.

> Nobel Laureate in Physics They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people. Maybe there is some other award recognition?

Young people? They only give to living people but my impression is not that most laureates are young

Edit: 72 years in average across all prizes, although first half of 20th century was lower.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37578899

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#10
post #5
post #2

Mitchell Feigenbaum has, for the last ~17 years, been my vote for the next Nobel Laureate in Physics. It is a rare thing to derive an irrational fundamental mathematical constant that appears in nature. The Feigenbaum constants are as fundamental as e and \pi, and they are readily observed experimentally (though, necessarily, not to full precision :) ). Godspeed, Dr. Feigenbaum. Thank you.

> Nobel Laureate in Physics They only give Nobels to living people, and typically only young people. Maybe there is some other award recognition?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN