There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
1–10 of 468 posts
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#2Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#3Well that's charitable...
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#4When I was on sabbatical I took life at a slower pace. And riding the train was just an amazing beautiful slow experience. Sometimes we just go through life to fast, and a nice slow train does the body well
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#5The next step would be to repair the tracks, which are shared by freight and passenger, which makes the ride worse.
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#6As someone who has taken the Lateshore Limited service all the way from Chicago to Boston in just a regular seat, I would strongly advise you NOT to do that. It is just miserable.
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#7> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. Well that's charitable...
What does this even mean? Do you only get a minor case of food poisoning if you eat it?
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#8Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#9Edit: Note that he did this during some leave time he had accumulated.
Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway
#10> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. Well that's charitable...
> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. What does this even mean? Do you only get a minor case of food poisoning if you eat it?