Live data from Hacker News

There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway

nytimes.com

1–10 of 468 posts

Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway

#4
There are many great reasons to take a train across the U.S.

When I was on sabbatical I took life at a slower pace. And riding the train was just an amazing beautiful slow experience. Sometimes we just go through life to fast, and a nice slow train does the body well

Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway

#6
Note that the author took a sleeper car. In terms of price, this is a bit of a luxury.

As someone who has taken the Lateshore Limited service all the way from Chicago to Boston in just a regular seat, I would strongly advise you NOT to do that. It is just miserable.

Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway

#7

> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. Well that's charitable...

> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine.

What does this even mean? Do you only get a minor case of food poisoning if you eat it?

Re: There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did it anyway

#10

> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. Well that's charitable...

> Amtrak food is on a par with the fourth-best airplane meal you could ever imagine. What does this even mean? Do you only get a minor case of food poisoning if you eat it?

It's an artistic way of saying it's unremarkable, or "meh."
Post reply on HN