In https://github.com/rocky/python-uncompyle6/wiki/pycdc-compared-with-uncompyle6 I compare two Python decompilers which I submit for your review. Of course, since I am working on one, I am not impartial. So I rely on others here to set the story straight.
A tale of two decompilers
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: A tale of two decompilers
#2If you wish, after submitting you can add a comment like "Author here. I have been working in this for 3 years. I'm happy to answer any question."
(Also, in the text I prefer when there are 3 or 4 subtitles that split the text in the main parts.)
Re: A tale of two decompilers
#3Try submitting again the URL without text. "self" submission have penalty here, so it's more difficult that they get traction. If you wish, after submitting you can add a comment like "Author here. I have been working in this for 3 years. I'm happy to answer any question." (Also, in the text I prefer when there are 3 or 4 subtitles that split the text in the main parts.)
If that's what you meant that is done now. Yes, I think that helps.
Re: A tale of two decompilers
#4Try submitting again the URL without text. "self" submission have penalty here, so it's more difficult that they get traction. If you wish, after submitting you can add a comment like "Author here. I have been working in this for 3 years. I'm happy to answer any question." (Also, in the text I prefer when there are 3 or 4 subtitles that split the text in the main parts.)
Thanks for the suggestions. I'm not sure I understand the part about the text in 3 or 4 subtitles. You mean section headings on the wiki page, right? If that's what you meant that is done now. Yes, I think that helps.