Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

infoworld.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

#2
Great to see C# still steadily moving forwards. Fantastic language, really only hampered by arbitrary limitations of the platform, and the knock-on effects of that (like the painful lack of ecosystem). I'm hoping it really starts to come into it's own in the next few years. At the very least, it could easily be an enterprise option that's actually both powerful and enjoyable.

Once upon a time, I remember C# vs Java being a meaningful comparison, but Oracle's total standstill has completely put an end to that (although I'm not actually sure who's fault that is - do Oracle deserve the blame for this?)

Re: Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

#4
The use case is advertised as allowing you to port code to new devices. But the github repo says it only supports Ubuntu, OSX, and Windows. Lastly C++ isn't generally considered a portable language.

Frankly the idea of porting a C# runtime to a new platform sounds more exciting then debugging 10,000SLoC of machine generated C++ to a new arch.

Re: Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

#6
post #3

This has already been submitted to HN recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12735260 Using the search tool is not that difficult

Serious question. What search tool?

There isn't one on the site itself, but people frequently use this https://hn.algolia.com/

Re: Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

#7
post #3

This has already been submitted to HN recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12735260 Using the search tool is not that difficult

Serious question. What search tool?

This little box with a "Search" label which is sitting at the bottom of the page.

Re: Microsoft's CoreRT turns C# into cross-platform C++

#8

The use case is advertised as allowing you to port code to new devices. But the github repo says it only supports Ubuntu, OSX, and Windows. Lastly C++ isn't generally considered a portable language. Frankly the idea of porting a C# runtime to a new platform sounds more exciting then debugging 10,000SLoC of machine generated C++ to a new arch.

If they only use a limited subset of C++, it is a pretty portable language. If they use all bells and whistles the language has to offer, then it will be a nightmare.
Post reply on HN