Live data from Hacker News

Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

nytimes.com

981–990 of 1001 posts

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#981
post #587

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, Reddit banned any sub that disagreed with the progressive positions on Transgender issues, any mainstream subs would ban users for disagreeing with those positions, and heterodox subs were warned not to discuss them or else they could be banned. For instance, here's the Moderate Politics sub discussion on why they banned transgender topics[1]: > The first of these banned topics: gender identity, the transgende…

But subreddits are free, and unlimited. You can make one yourself if you don't like how another one is moderated. People that like your approach can gather there. Of course that takes effort and is not easy, but Reddit itself (for the most part) is not banning you or your sub if you want to make a right wing house plant subreddit. If you want to make a pro Luigi anti transgender house plant subreddit, it probably get…

"r/austintexas is banned due to being unmoderated"

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#982
post #509

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this was my take as well. twitter nostalgia not reality. I put the egalitarian age at around 2009 but you're right Kony-2012 was a huge pivot for social media

I was talking about reality. Twitter wasn't perfect in 02012 but it was before the reproductively viable worker ant.

i don't think i've heard that story yet

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#984
post #862

Earlier quoted context omitted.

His work may be unsavory, but he's good at his craft. Frank Abagnale committed financial crimes and had a wildly popular movie made from his story.

Ironically, most of his stories were blowing smoke. He wasn't actually nearly as successful at any of that as he was at making up stories and convincing everyone how successful he had been at it. When dealing with a con artist, rule number one is believe nothing they say, certainly not about what they've done!

I still find it funny that a con artist conned people about his life as a con artist. He peaked.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#985

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if the purpose of naming it „X“, just like naming „Facebook“ meta is to do the opposite of SEO: Make it harder to find news pertaining to the company and their scandals.

Facebook is still called Facebook.

Yes but articles mentioning only meta, but not Facebook, will be found on google in the middle of unrelated articles.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#986

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> if he believes the terrible things he's posting or is just ironically posting them. The thing is, as I get older, I realize more and more that this is a distinction without a difference. If you "ironically" stab someone, does it matter what your motivation? The same is true for edgelord stuff. Whether you believe it internally is irrelevant, the active act of the posting is the only part that matters. If you post f…

> Whether you believe it internally is irrelevant, the active act of the posting is the only part that matters. > If you post fascist content to be "edgy", you're a fascist. Is Trump a constitutionalist because he claims to love the constitution? Is Kim Jong Un a "democratic republican"?

You missed where I said it's the act that matters.

So trump /says/ one thing, but his actions say something very different.

------

So, if you say nothing and do nothing, you cannot be defined.

If you say fascist things (even if you're "joking"), but do nothing, you are a fascist.

If you say non-fascist things but /do/ fascist things, the thing with the most active action defines you (i.e. the person doing the fascist things is a fascist).

Words mean little in the face of taking active actions.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#987
post #962

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because a lot of tech sucks lately? Everything now is just new kinds of ways to spy on people or the same old shit repackaged in a new format. I'm dying for some actual innovation. The only new product in tech I actually like lately is the Steam Deck and later, the Ally X. Making PC gaming mobile is incredible, and I guess you could say there's nothing revolutionary there, but I dunno, it's new at least and not flagr…

I think the person you replied to was just mad their opinion was unpopular, but your comment really does seem excessively negative. All the new tech sucks? We just got tech that can write an email, code a simple program, and potentially more. We got laptops with battery life measured in days that generate almost no heat or noise. We’ve had some awesome advances in memory safe programming languages. All sorts of hacke…

> We just got tech that can write an email, code a simple program, and potentially more.

It does the second thing decently well.

> We got laptops with battery life measured in days that generate almost no heat or noise.

So? Laptop's a laptop. And while they increased the battery life they also took away a ton of the ports and made them spy on you.

> We’ve had some awesome advances in memory safe programming languages.

That one I'll give you. Now if we could just get industry to actually use them instead of putting everything in fucking React.

> All sorts of hacker friendly gadgets like 3D printers and Framework devices are available in more varieties and at lower prices than ever.

That's... kind of exciting, as long as you set aside concerns about microplastics. However the Framework laptop still isn't a mainstream thing and neither is linux, so the vast majority of users are still being ravenously exploited by the tech sector's surveillance industrial complex. I do not consider this a victory until everyone is saved, not just people technically literate enough to innovate themselves out of it.

> Apple and Google are starting to ease up on some of their worst policies and give developers more options for revenue.

Oh wow they're only crushing 29 orphans per hour instead of 30, throw a fucking parade.

> You can criticize things you don’t like but saying it’s all or even mostly bad just seems completely wrong. I think one of the things that makes Reddit (and HN, and X, and some Discords and corners of YouTube) unappealing these days is the extreme toxic negativity about everything.

It IS mostly bad, and I don't say that as some bitter old hacker, I say that as someone who grew up, fell in love with technology, and then watched Big Business Assholes utterly ruin it!

The Internet is nearly UNUSABLE now for anything that isn't motherfucking commerce. Blogs and forums are dead and the majority of social networks are more anti-social than they've ever been. I don't even SEE friends on Facebook anymore, it's just a wall of generated bullshit content trying to either make me horny or piss me off, sometimes both. Instagram is a dead mall. Tiktok is psychological torture. Twitter is open mic night at the Reichstag circa 1941. We're more connected than we've ever been yet somehow I'm less informed on anything I actually give a shit about. If it doesn't make money, nobody will help you spread it around. Except Blusky and Mastadon.

Damn near every application I use daily is now written in JavaScript. Websites run by companies worth billions just don't load sometimes and that's just an understood thing that happens. Apps make my phone hot sending text messages. Every software update has the potential to completely redesign UI's almost always for the worse, and I am unable to opt out in any way. Windows is an utter nightmare to use, practically adware itself now, with parts of fucking EXPLORER written in React because even MICROSOFT can't be fucked to develop software properly now apparently.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#988

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you read the section regarding the merger requirements which is quite unusual and reveals the level of control of Musk et. al (X Holdings)? This is why I brought up that particular 8k. The ownership and board structure serve as de facto evidence of control by Musk. There really aren't any other companies (notably in the social media sector) that have this ownership structure. Hilariously enough, by board structur…

Yes, owners of companies obviously control them. That doesn't make the CEO a figurehead. There isn't a company in existence where the (hired) CEO has more power than the person who owns the company .

In order:

- No. There are many companies that have board mandates such that one single entity can never have a prima facie super-majority of voting power.

- Yes it does. Under this structure, the CEO has no voting power on the board or right to initiate matters before it. Usually, a CEO has at least 1 vote and that right.

- Not true in corporations where there are distinct cohorts of stock classes such that the owners of (e.g. class "A") a particular stock have 10-100x more voting power than (e.g. class "B") and as a "price" to assume the role of CEO one must "purchase" a controlling majority of shares.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#989

It is perhaps just a coincidence that this happened the day after “Mecha-Hitler” Grok going on racist screeds and going into lurid sexual fantasies about her in particular for the whole world to see. But it does look bad.

I really would not be surprised if "being sexually harassed by MechaHitler" was the last straw.

I believe that would be the line for me. Personally, anyway.

Re: Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

#990

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's wrong with Bluesky?

Bluesky is not a real decentralized system as the company behind it say. Bluesky (the company) controls most key parts of the network, and it is basically impossible to setup a really decentralised alternative provider for the ATProto network, like you can do today with ActivityPub (Mastodon) or Nostr. Sure, you can setup you PDS and own your data, but it is useless without the Relays and a self-hosted Firehose, and…

Multiple people have set up their own relays (which, by the way, is the firehose), and multiple people have set up their own application backends (which I think is what you're calling the relay)

It's fully possible to stand up the network on your own infrastructure, and to communicate with other providers

Post reply on HN