Earlier quoted context omitted.
macOS is fine, you guys are just overreacting… Is it perfect? No. Is it usable? Clearly yes.
Maybe they have standards and preferences. "fine" and "overreacting" seem like your very subjective value judgements.
Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
951–960 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#952Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#953Earlier quoted context omitted.
macOS is fine, you guys are just overreacting… Is it perfect? No. Is it usable? Clearly yes.
My M5 pro macbook panics one to two times a week. I narrowed it down to an issue with a thunderbolt-linked ethernet adapter. I reported it about ten times, Apple never replied or addressed it. After a while I decided to take things into my own hands, and to write my own driver. Just installing a VM you can load a driver in for development and testing was a two-week effort. Everything locked down. Their VM infrastruct…
btw if it happens often, check your cable, try a different one
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#954Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried to love my work issued m4 pro for many months but couldn't stand macOS so asked for a linux compatible machine.
Out of curiosity what do you need to do with the OS that you can't on MacOS? Ive always found Linux too ugly looking to use and in terms of functionalities I'm not sure what I'm missing in MacOS
Docker on Linux is miles better and efficient.
Window management and Desktop environment on Linux is whatever I want it to be.
Open source gives me freedom: I (LLMs) can investigate/fix/change anything since it's all opensource. Don't like round borders? Easy. Want to fix a bug or improve a behaviour? Not impossible, often easy.
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#955Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a little sluggish > surprised by how quick it felt Aren't these properties of the (G)UI rather than of the processor? I've been using systems 20 years ago that were super snappy. The same software would still be snappy today obviously. But the software has become bloated to the point that you need to run the latest generation of CPUs such that things are not sluggish. In principle you don't need 32-core GHz CPUs to…
> " the software has become bloated " Casey Muratori has a 20 minute talk on YouTube called "Clean code, horrible performance"[1]. Using an oft-repeated example in C++ he rewrites it uncleanly and then benchmarks. Removing Classes/subclasses/polymorphism: 1.5x faster. That overhead was like reducing an iPhone 14 to an iPhone 11 performance. Replacing Encapsulation with a table-driven calculation: 10x faster. That ove…
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#956Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a little sluggish > surprised by how quick it felt Aren't these properties of the (G)UI rather than of the processor? I've been using systems 20 years ago that were super snappy. The same software would still be snappy today obviously. But the software has become bloated to the point that you need to run the latest generation of CPUs such that things are not sluggish. In principle you don't need 32-core GHz CPUs to…
> " the software has become bloated " Casey Muratori has a 20 minute talk on YouTube called "Clean code, horrible performance"[1]. Using an oft-repeated example in C++ he rewrites it uncleanly and then benchmarks. Removing Classes/subclasses/polymorphism: 1.5x faster. That overhead was like reducing an iPhone 14 to an iPhone 11 performance. Replacing Encapsulation with a table-driven calculation: 10x faster. That ove…
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#957Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder when/if we will start to see Apple include a silicon encoded model into their chips. Similar to Taalas build Llama 3.1 silicon with 17,000 tok/s inference. So could the M7 actually include an AFM 3B model, alongside a generic neural engine?
It would make zero sense. These things are improving by leaps and bounds every week, we are not at the point where you can burn weights into silicon and put it on one of the largest consumer devices on the planet yet.
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#958Earlier quoted context omitted.
This applies to the whole stack, even ignoring the GUI, you would not find systems with a gazillion of processes, doing OS IPC all over the place, because the hardware could not accommodate it. But hey, microservices and static linking are the future. /s
> But hey, microservices and static linking are the future. /s Aren't those two things contradicting each other? ;) I think macOS getting more sluggish in each release (which is objectively true) is just plain old bad software engineering and prioritising the wrong things. E.g. it's just Apple's version of "What Andy giveth, Bill taketh away.".
Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#959Re: Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra
#960Earlier quoted context omitted.
This eventual sluggishness is due to inevitable OS rot. I bought a brand new MBP in 2017 and it was snappy as hell. Booted up instantly, breezed through complex tasks, and ran GarageBand and Logic Pro X very smoothly. Every OS update seemed to take it down a notch and eventually Logic Pro X - my main production tool - was unusable. I happed to be talking about this to a professional music producer friend of mine and…
Interesting -- seems to be a "Docker for music production" product in there somewhere