Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe elaborate your comment further to prevent confusion? When you commented >"I hear ya, but something smells real bad about how Epic decided to wage this war" I read it as "I agree that the situation is unfair but I disagree with how they decided to uncover it because it was deliberate".
Yes exactly, I don’t know how much effort they put in to just discussing it with Apple, but it is clear they planned this out and that’s why I don’t like about it. And their plan seems a bit melodramatic to me.
There are a number of facets in common here:
1. What is legal is not necessarily what is right.
2. You can intentionally break a rule/law and then use the press to highlight your case.
Maybe you would disagree with Rosa Parks and the civil rights movement's methods as well, and that's fine, certainly many people did disagree at the time (more then than now though).
I'm just pointing out that there are parallels in history for this kind of intentional rule-breaking and subsequent PR campaign.