Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Pro

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

921–930 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#921

Post by xwowsersx »

EcommerceFlow wrote: post #816
xwowsersx wrote: post #723

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you share what sort of things you are doing with o1?

Creating somewhat complex python scripts at work to automate some processes which incorporate like 3-4 APIs, and next I'll be replacing our excise tax processing (which costs us like $500/month) since we already have all the data. Personal use I'll be using it to upgrade all my website code. I literally took a screenshot of Apple.com and combined it with existing code from my website and told o1 pro to combine the tw…

Interesting, thanks for the details. I haven't played around with o1 enough yet. The kinds of tasks I had it do seemed to be performed just as well by 4o. I'm sure I just wasn't throwing enough at it.

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#922

Post by js212 »

submeta wrote: post #394

I actually pay 166 Euros a month for Claude Teams. Five seats. And I only use one. For myself. Why do I pay so much? Because the normal paid version (20 USD a month) interrups the chats after a dozen questions and wants me to wait a few hours until I can use it again. But Teams plan gives me way more questions. But why do I pay that much? Because Claude in combination with the Projects feature, where I can upload two…

Try typingmind.com with the API

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#923

Post by nuz »

This kind of pricing strategy makes me think we're gonna have a pretty rough time once AGI arrives making any money. (I.e. no 'too cheap to meter' and basically all the rich getting richer.)

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#924

Post by Night_Thastus »

nuz wrote: post #923

This kind of pricing strategy makes me think we're gonna have a pretty rough time once AGI arrives making any money. (I.e. no 'too cheap to meter' and basically all the rich getting richer.)

Well, then the good news is AGI isn't anywhere near.

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#926

Post by hellcow »

__MatrixMan__ wrote: post #668
mtlynch wrote: post #664

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kagi Ultimate (US$25/mo) includes unlimited use of all the Anthropic models. Full disclosure: I participated in Kagi's crowdfund, so I have some financial stake in the company, but I mainly participated because I'm an enthusiastic customer.

I'm uninformed about this, it may just be superstition, but my feeling while using Kagi in this way is that after using it for a few hours it gets a bit more forgetful. I come back the next day and it's smart again, for while. It's as if there's some kind of soft throttling going on in the background. I'm an enthusiastic customer nonetheless, but it is curious.

I noticed this too! It's dramatic in the same chat. I'll come back the next day, and even though I still have the full convo history, and it's as if it completely forgot all my earlier instructions.

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#927

Post by datameta »

jijji wrote: post #920
fudged71 wrote: post #443

OpenAI is racing against two clocks: the commoditization clock (how quickly open-source alternatives catch up) and the monetization clock (their need to generate substantial revenue to justify their valuation). The ultimate success of this strategy depends on what we might call the enterprise AI adoption curve - whether large organizations will prioritize the kind of integrated, reliable, and "safe" AI solutions Open…

What ever happened to IBM Watson? IBM wishes it would have taken off like ChatGPT

Has anyone heard or seen it used anywhere? I was in-house when it launched to big fanfare by upper management and the vast majority of the company was tasked to create team projects utilizing Watsonm

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#929

Post by stanford_labrat »

apugoneappu wrote: post #895
danpalmer wrote: post #515

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that OpenAI don't really have the enterprise market at all. Their APIs are closer in that many companies are using them to power features in other software, primarily Microsoft, but they're not the ones providing end user value to enterprises with APIs. As for ChatGPT, it's a consumer tool, not an enterprise tool. It's not really integrated into an enterprises' existing toolset, it's not integrated int…

ChatGPT does have an enterprise version. I've seen the enterprise version with a top-5 consulting company, and it answers from their global knowledgebase, cites references, and doesn't train on their data.

I recently (in the last month) asked ChatGPT to cite its sources for some scientific data. It gave me completely made up, entirely fabricated citations for academic papers that did not exist.

Re: ChatGPT Pro

#930

Post by mirrorlake »

Atotalnoob wrote: post #425
A_D_E_P_T wrote: post #407

I just bought a pro subscription. First impressions: The new o1-Pro model is an insanely good writer. Aside from favoring the long em-dash (—) which isn't on most keyboards, it has none of the quirks and tells of old GPT-4/4o/o1. It managed to totally fool every "AI writing detector" I ran it through. It can handle unusually long prompts. It appears to be very good at complex data analysis. I need to put it through i…

AI writing detectors are snake oil

Anecdotally, English/History/Communications professors are confirming cheaters with them because they find it easy to identify false information. The red flags are so obvious that the checker tools are just a formality: student papers now have fake URLs and fake citations. Students will boldly submit college papers which have paragraphs about nonexistent characters, or make false claims about what characters did in a story.

The e-mail correspondence goes like this: "Hello Professor, I'd like to meet to discuss my failing grade. I didn't know that using ChatGPT was bad, can I have some points back or rewrite my essay?"

Post reply on HN