Live data from Hacker News

U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

washingtonpost.com

91–100 of 363 posts

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#91
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The response they've given in the past to pardon petitions isn't much of a response at all. I expect a similar non-answer here. Cf. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/why-we-cant-commen... https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/why-we-can’t-comme...

That's actually really sad that they will blatantly not comment on a high profile petition.

Those petitions aren't terribly high-profile: they're sitting at 6619 and 8249 signatures each, versus nearly 100K for the Snowden petition.

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#92
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? I doubt Snowden expected anything different.

Greenwald/The Guardian won't release it out of fear of being brought up on similar charges. I don't know why they haven't released it already, unless it's just more of the same sort of vaguely incriminating powerpoint presentations.

It lets the government keep lying itself into corners.

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#93
post #27

So now is the time to identify the federal prosecutors who filed this and petition the government to have them fired. In addition, of course, to asking for a complete pardon for Snowden. It also should be noted that any of the Congressional investigations into this mess are perfectly capable of giving Snowden a grant of immunity from prosecution. People ask what to do. There are at least two avenues open to nip this…

I actually don't think charging him is inherently bad. If he in fact took 4 government property laptops with him, that's a crime, at the very least. Ideally, pre-trial investigation and a trial would be fair way to find facts. It's entirely possible minor crimes (violating classified NDA, taking laptops, etc.) would be non-conviction based on other information, but on its face, I don't really have a problem with init…

However, espionage != theft.

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#94
post #92
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Greenwald/The Guardian won't release it out of fear of being brought up on similar charges. I don't know why they haven't released it already, unless it's just more of the same sort of vaguely incriminating powerpoint presentations.

It lets the government keep lying itself into corners.

That's valid.

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#95

Espionage is punishable by death. I sincerely hope Snowden finds asylum somewhere safe --Iceland perhaps-- as the Department of Justice has made it perfectly clear that this patriot is no longer welcome here.

The only civilians executed for espionage in the US were the Rosenbergs in 1953 and that is widely seen as an overreaction that occurred in the context of the hysteria of the early Cold War. Only three people have been executed by the Federal government for any crime since 1963. It is incredibly unlikely that Snowden would be executed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_the_Unite...

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#97

So now is the time to identify the federal prosecutors who filed this and petition the government to have them fired. In addition, of course, to asking for a complete pardon for Snowden. It also should be noted that any of the Congressional investigations into this mess are perfectly capable of giving Snowden a grant of immunity from prosecution. People ask what to do. There are at least two avenues open to nip this…

The pardon petition also only needs more 7k signatures: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pardon-edward-snow... Remember that the goal is to get the government address the issue, and show that the people are not fine with the NSA's actions. It would be nice to get them to actually pardon him, but that is a much harder goal.

Has any whitehouse.gov petition ever led to actual action being taken?

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#99
post #37
post #11

It looks like this charge can carry the death penalty because it involves "communications intelligence". From http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/794 : "(a) Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any foreign government, or…

Now the states he can move to just went up. Death penalty: Many countries, such as Australia, Canada, Macao, New Zealand, South Africa, and most European nations except Belarus, will not allow extradition if the death penalty may be imposed on the suspect unless they are assured that the death sentence will not be passed or carried out.

I don't think Virginia allows the death penalty for espionage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Virginia#...

Re: U.S. charges Edward Snowden with espionage

#100
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The national security establishment is more or less exempted from the whistleblower statutes.

That didn't work out very well for Thomas Drake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake

Well, sort of. All the charges against him were dropped except a single misdemeanor. He got one year probation and community service. A very different set of circumstances than Snowden, though.
Post reply on HN