Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

apple.com

91–100 of 514 posts

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#91

I like that there's support for locally-run models on Xcode. I wish I thought that the Game Porting Toolkit 3 would make a difference, but I think Apple's going to have to incentivize game studios to use it. And they should; the Apple Silicon is good enough to run a lot of games. ... when are they going to have the courage to release MacOS Bakersfield? C'mon. Do it. You're gonna tell me California's all zingers? Nah.…

yeah, getting better LLM support for XCode is great!

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#92
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it offensive to have any generative AI code on my computer.

I promise you there is Linux code that has been tab-completed with Copilot or similar, perhaps even before ChatGPT ever launched

That is true. I actually was ambiguous in my post, because I meant code that generates stuff, not that was generated by AI, even though I don't like the latter, either.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#93

Some 15 years ago, A friend of mine said to me "mark my words, Apple will eventually merge OSX with iOS on the iPad". And with every passing keynote since then, it seemed Apple's been inching towards that prophecy, and today, the iPad has become practically a MacBook Air with a touch screen. Unless you were a video editor, programmer who needs resources to compile or a 3D artist, I don't see how you'd need anything o…

I think practically everyone is better off with a laptop. iPad is great if you're an artist using the pencil, or just consuming media on it. Otherwise a macbook is far more powerful and ergonomic to use.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#94
post #43

iPadOS and OSX continue to converge into one platform.

Multi-user iPadOS when?

When they figure out how to make it not dent sales of individual devices. If you and your spouse could easily share one around the house for different purposes but still having each of your personal apps and settings, you might not buy two!

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#96
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yeah -- I saw it's built on "open source foundations", do you know what project this is?

Being able to drop Docker Desktop would be great. We're using Podman on MacOS now in a couple places, it's pretty good but it is another tool. Having the same tool across MacOS and Linux would be nice.

There's also Rancher Desktop (https://rancherdesktop.io/). Supports moby and containerd; also optionally runs kubernetes.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#97

> New Design with Liquid Glass Looks like software UI design – just like fashion, film, architecture and many other fields I'm sure – has now officially entered the "nothing new under the sun" / "let's recycle ideas from xx years ago" stage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqua_%28user_interface%29 To be clear, this is just an observation, not a judgment of that change or the quality of the design by itself. I was gett…

I love that we're getting some texture back. UI has been so boring since iOS 7.

Sebastiaan de With of Halide fame did a writeup about this recently, and I think he makes some great points.

https://www.lux.camera/physicality-the-new-age-of-ui/

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#98
post #51
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's impossible to have "native" support for Linux containers on macOS, since the technology inherently relies on Linux kernel features. So I'm guessing this is Apple rolling out their own Linux virtualization layer (same as WSL). Probably still an improvement over the current mess, but if they just support LXC and not Docker then most devs will still need to install Docker Desktop like they do today.

What about macOS being derived from BSD? Isn’t that where containers came from: BSD jails? I know the container ecosystem largely targets Linux just curious what people’s thoughts are on that.

BSD jails are architected wholly differently from what something like Docker provides.

Jails are first-class citizens that are baked deep into the system.

A tool like Docker relies using multiple Linux features/tools to assemble/create isolation.

Additionally, iirc, the logic for FreeBSD jails never made it into the Darwin kernel.

Someone correct me please.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#99

> New Design with Liquid Glass Looks like software UI design – just like fashion, film, architecture and many other fields I'm sure – has now officially entered the "nothing new under the sun" / "let's recycle ideas from xx years ago" stage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqua_%28user_interface%29 To be clear, this is just an observation, not a judgment of that change or the quality of the design by itself. I was gett…

To me it looks more like Windows Vista's "Aero" than OS X's "Aqua".

Yes, I immediately thought of Windows Aero too!!! I wasn’t able to enable it until I got a 9800GX2 a few years later, very cool at the time combined with the ability to have movies as your desktop background. It was a nice vibe.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#100

Some 15 years ago, A friend of mine said to me "mark my words, Apple will eventually merge OSX with iOS on the iPad". And with every passing keynote since then, it seemed Apple's been inching towards that prophecy, and today, the iPad has become practically a MacBook Air with a touch screen. Unless you were a video editor, programmer who needs resources to compile or a 3D artist, I don't see how you'd need anything o…

Whether or not they eventually fuse, I don't know—I doubt it. But the approach they've taken over the past 15 years to gradually increase the similarities in user experience, while not trying to force a square peg in a round hole, have been the best path in terms of usability.

I think Microsoft was a little too eager to fuse their tablet and desktop interface. It has produced some interesting innovations in the process but it's been nowhere near as polished as ipadOS/macOS.

Post reply on HN