Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was always about the right wing kind of free speech - free to harass and insult people, freedom from consequences.
> It was always about the right wing kind of free speech It was always about the kind of speech that was being banned. Movement Democrats like to think of themselves as left-wing, so everything that opposes their party becomes right-wing, including people to the left of them. Movement Democrats weren't being banned for spreading misinformation, they were being encouraged. > free to harass and insult people, freedom f…
Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
91–100 of 127 posts
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many if not most studies don’t clearly demarcate pre-omicron covid vs omicron. I’d love to know what the science is on myocarditis risk from just omicron is.
There have been numerous studies showing that omicron severity is very likely equivalent to prior strains. The decrease in serious illness is due to prior immunity and vaccination. Though it’s obviously a hard thing to prove either way. But certainly I do not think it should be assumed that omicron is inherently more mild.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#93Exactly what was that note supposed to be correcting? Humor me. Musk made a very short statement with a single factual claim: "Myocarditis is a known side-effect [of a vaccine.]" The community note correcting it says that Covid causes more myocarditis than that covid vaccine. How is that a correction? It's a snarky verification.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
[citation needed]
Citation(s) given. [0] The Hunter Biden laptop story [1] was censored on Twitter and The NY Post had their accounts locked over the story and the Twitter CEO at the time admitted that it was a 'mistake'. EDIT: So there you have it. Even when I have given citations and substantiated them with links, I still get censored for it for no reason because it is true. Of course. Cannot begin to even reason with the folks here…
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ... significant economic coercision meets my definition of force Military members are vaccinated against a myriad of illnesses right after joining . They are also required to follow a bunch of rules, some of which severely restrict the practice of their first amendment rights. They weren't "forced", as much as they have to agree with the DoD rules to work for them.
We should at least acknowledge the "trolley" problem here. You have two bad choices: join the marines or live in poverty. The US has a "volunteer" force but "volunteer" is a stretched euphemism in my mind. There aren't many people with options "volunteering" for the marines. Obligatory "I'm pro vaccine".
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But if you can give people the virus whether vaccinated or not, there is functionally no difference in how much you were endangering people You are now suggesting that vaccines did not prevent severe illness, which is not true.
But that doesn't change whether you are endangering people by infecting them.
Vaccinations were a matter of public health. Vaccines did not prevent infections, but they prevented severe illness.
The healthcare system was collapsing under the pressure from hundreds of thousands of patients suffering from severe illness. This would put any other people seeking for care at risk, since they could not get it.
Since vaccinations would prevent severe illness, that would alleviate the pressure on the system, thus making care available to people who otherwise wouldn't be able to get it.
It's not that hard to understand.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#97To be fair, that twitter context post is almost entirely useless. Comparing the risk of myocarditis from vaccines to the risk of myocarditis from actually getting covid is not a helpful comparison. Generally speaking, everyone is going to get covid whether you are vaxxed or unvaxxed. So the question is whether adding vaccines into the mix REDUCES the overall myocarditis risk or increases it. In other words (Covid inf…
By itself, this carries a high "we found a link between green jelly beans and acne" flavor (xkcd/882). But even if it's not there, there are a lot of other complicating factors.
Those studies about myocarditis were important because they derived improvements on the procedure to apply intramuscular vaccines. But that improvement by itself is enough to invalidate any findings you will find on any such study from that time.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#98Is there any actual evidence of foul play here? Could just be the note got enough bad ratings to stop being featured. Not that removing it would be entirely out of character for him, but Musk has gotten community notes applied to his Tweets before and always maintained that that was allowed and a good thing.
Removing it on Musk's orders wouldn't be foul play anyway. He owns the business. He can decide how it operates, including preferential treatment for himself.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#99I’m surprised when I see people uncritically repeating the claim that Twitter now aims for “free speech.” It’s clear that was never true and always meant “Speech Elon wants to allow.”
I'm surprised when I see a comment ascribing this to Elon deleting things upvoted higher than the comments that explain this is a normal part of how Community Notes work for so-so notes.
Re: Community Note correcting Musk’s anti-vax tweet mysteriously disappears
#100I’m surprised when I see people uncritically repeating the claim that Twitter now aims for “free speech.” It’s clear that was never true and always meant “Speech Elon wants to allow.”
It was always about the right wing kind of free speech - free to harass and insult people, freedom from consequences.