Live data from Hacker News

Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

devpod.sh

91–100 of 157 posts

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#91

> DevPod is the first and only tool for creating and managing dev environments that does not require a heavyweight server-side setup. I guess either "dev environment" means something different to what I understand by the term, or Nixpkgs is considered a "heavyweight server-side setup"?

I also don't see how this is different from devcontainers, which are like codespaces, but without it being hosted on a server.

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#92
post #87
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only that, when using Firefox (Chrome seems fine), it's selected by default on Windows and Linux.

FF unfortunately does not support detecting the OS reliably...

Is it because of tracking protection/fingerprinting protection being on by default?

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#93
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vagrant was fantastic pre-Docker and is still arguably more useful for certain cases, but I recall having issues running it last I tried. Based on the website, VirtualBox still lacks stable ARM64 support. Would "boxes" downloaded from the Vagrant cloud need to be built for ARM64 as well, or does it emulate?

It does not emulate. My org has been deprecating Vagrant ever since IT started issuing Apple Silicon as an option. Replacement is Docker Compose, or cloud VMs for software with heavy disk I/O.

Is there such a significant problem with disk IO going to docker for Mac over vagrant?

Now there is overhead for mounting local volumes into the container, but I’ve found them to be negligible on my Apple Silicon Mac’s in the last year or 2. (Apple seems to have been the one to fix it with their new virtualization framework which docker for Mac supports).

Now back when they first added their APFS file system things were atrociously slow when it came to Disk IO (as in 10x slowdowns or more) and there were various workarounds but it seems resolved to me now.

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#95
post #14

What are some of the competitors in this space? - Gitpod, a SaaS competitor to Codespaces. http://gitpod.io - Coder, which I guess is the more enterprisey self-hosted Codespaces alternative? https://coder.com - This project, Devpod, seems to be a polished experience but not centralized like Coder. - I recently stumbled upon Recode, which looks like a more indie take on the problem. https://github.com/recode-sh/cli

It's a lot older but I would say Vagrant intersects with this space https://github.com/hashicorp/vagrant Possibly devenv, as well.. Though I haven't personally tried it https://devenv.sh/

Kinda sort nix?

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#96

What are some of the competitors in this space? - Gitpod, a SaaS competitor to Codespaces. http://gitpod.io - Coder, which I guess is the more enterprisey self-hosted Codespaces alternative? https://coder.com - This project, Devpod, seems to be a polished experience but not centralized like Coder. - I recently stumbled upon Recode, which looks like a more indie take on the problem. https://github.com/recode-sh/cli

Seems like toolbox is also in this space; https://github.com/containers/toolbox

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#97
Is there IDE support for full fat Visual Studio? I recall them adding support for the devcontainer concept last year sometime? (I could be wrong, and/or it may have been a limited set of capabilities, you know MS)

I have a mix of jetbrains, vs code and vs ent devs, would be great to unify their development experience a little

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#98
post #87
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only that, when using Firefox (Chrome seems fine), it's selected by default on Windows and Linux.

FF unfortunately does not support detecting the OS reliably...

Even with "strict" tracking prevention Linux is still in the user agent string. That's been very reliably IME.

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#99

What are some of the competitors in this space? - Gitpod, a SaaS competitor to Codespaces. http://gitpod.io - Coder, which I guess is the more enterprisey self-hosted Codespaces alternative? https://coder.com - This project, Devpod, seems to be a polished experience but not centralized like Coder. - I recently stumbled upon Recode, which looks like a more indie take on the problem. https://github.com/recode-sh/cli

For something a bit more lightweight, Toast: https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast

This reads a lot like https://earthly.dev

Re: Codespaces but open-source, client-only, and unopinionated

#100
post #97

Is there IDE support for full fat Visual Studio? I recall them adding support for the devcontainer concept last year sometime? (I could be wrong, and/or it may have been a limited set of capabilities, you know MS) I have a mix of jetbrains, vs code and vs ent devs, would be great to unify their development experience a little

DevPod works with any IDE. We support VS Code (local and browser), pretty much the entire Jetbrains suite, and you can even connect via VIM :D
Post reply on HN