I am going to chime in being negative against the wave of positive feedback here. Twitter has done well releasing this and when I first saw it ages ago it looked neat and fairly professional. However, like a pop song which has been completely overplayed on the radio it has become tired and frankly a bit annoying. It has its uses offline to quickly get a demo up and running but it shouldn't be used on a live site. At…
Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
91–100 of 163 posts
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#92I am going to chime in being negative against the wave of positive feedback here. Twitter has done well releasing this and when I first saw it ages ago it looked neat and fairly professional. However, like a pop song which has been completely overplayed on the radio it has become tired and frankly a bit annoying. It has its uses offline to quickly get a demo up and running but it shouldn't be used on a live site. At…
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#93Is there a reason for this?
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#94The coolest new feature? Bootstrap 2.0 is completely responsive. This is what it looks like on different screen sizes: http://areyouresponsive.com/twitter.github.com%2Fbootstrap%2...
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#95I am going to chime in being negative against the wave of positive feedback here. Twitter has done well releasing this and when I first saw it ages ago it looked neat and fairly professional. However, like a pop song which has been completely overplayed on the radio it has become tired and frankly a bit annoying. It has its uses offline to quickly get a demo up and running but it shouldn't be used on a live site. At…
Unless you're targeting developers or Silicon Valley who cares? Most people couldn't tell you the difference between a Bootstrap site or a non-bootstrap site, even if they could its unlikely they would actually care. As a dev who admittedly sucks at CSS I'll take better looking and clone-like (and cross-browser) over ugly and unique any day.
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#96I wonder if we can look forward to mustache being implemented in in 2.1?
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#97I am going to chime in being negative against the wave of positive feedback here. Twitter has done well releasing this and when I first saw it ages ago it looked neat and fairly professional. However, like a pop song which has been completely overplayed on the radio it has become tired and frankly a bit annoying. It has its uses offline to quickly get a demo up and running but it shouldn't be used on a live site. At…
Bootstrap is not overused; just under customized. In all fairness, what this proves is that there is a fairly large market for such packaged customization themes which are built thoughtfully and work on all resolutions.
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#98Been using Bootstrapwip2 for a few days on http://sharemegithub.com I wonder if we can look forward to mustache being implemented in in 2.1?
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bootstrap is not overused; just under customized. In all fairness, what this proves is that there is a fairly large market for such packaged customization themes which are built thoughtfully and work on all resolutions.
This has already been proved by themeforest.net years ago with their admin templates
Instead, if they did a (or a few) authoritative themes with compass css with such good documentation as bootstrap and their theme works at all resolutions, I'm sure people will use that one too.
Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter
#100Last week 2.0 introduced me to the world of responsive design. Converted our current project to it. Higher ups are pleased and it saved me from creating a second "mobile" site. I am a fan.
Now that it includes mobile flexibility, it's even better. I'll look at putting it toward my latest weekend hack: http://www.livelystocks.com