Live data from Hacker News

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

anandtech.com

91–100 of 127 posts

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#91
post #53
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is really annoying when building a NAS too. Great value CPUs with ECC support make the configurations great and then you need to spend 50-100€ to just get boot graphics even though the machine will be headless 99% of the time. Buying something second hand or from aliexpress defeats the purpose of trying to build something reliable. The market for low-end discrete GPUs has all but vanished thanks to Intel integra…

> and then you need to spend 50-100€ to just get boot graphics even though the machine will be headless 99% of the time. Buy a serial-over-USB patch cable; connect it from the NAS to your laptop; open an STTY emulator on the laptop. No boot graphics needed.

Had no idea that would even boot. I prefer being able to just plug in a monitor but that's an interesting option.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#92

I like Anandtech. They have some really great deep dive articles on CPUs and system architecture. Which is why this type of 'test' is just weird. None of the CPUs they compare seem to be in the same price bracket. Many aren't even from the same generation. 7700K? 8086K? 4900HS? Yes, sometimes you have to work with what you have, but c'mon - at least one somewhat comparable CPU would've been nice for reference (i3 810…

They are comparing it against previous gen gaming CPUs to help people trying to decide if it is worth upgrading.

Fair enough. But I would imagine the vast majority of those folks will be looking at $300-$700 CPUs in that case - going from a top-of-the-line CPU to a low/mid-grade seems like an unusual choice.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#93

I like Anandtech. They have some really great deep dive articles on CPUs and system architecture. Which is why this type of 'test' is just weird. None of the CPUs they compare seem to be in the same price bracket. Many aren't even from the same generation. 7700K? 8086K? 4900HS? Yes, sometimes you have to work with what you have, but c'mon - at least one somewhat comparable CPU would've been nice for reference (i3 810…

its usually faster than the i5 9400F

I would expect so, but that's what benchmarks are for!

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#94
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still need something for boot graphics for the BIOS, unless non-server motherboards are coming with serial redirection default enabled and nobody mentioned it.

Set it up with a temporary card and then yank it out after it's setup. You don't tend to access the BIOS that much.

I wonder if it's possible to set up the UEFI firmware by setting some EFI variables from the operating system for example by running efivar [1].

[1]: https://github.com/rhboot/efivar

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#95
post #64
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and then you need to spend 50-100€ to just get boot graphics even though the machine will be headless 99% of the time. Buy a serial-over-USB patch cable; connect it from the NAS to your laptop; open an STTY emulator on the laptop. No boot graphics needed.

Still need something for boot graphics for the BIOS, unless non-server motherboards are coming with serial redirection default enabled and nobody mentioned it.

I mean, why not use a server motherboard (i.e. one supporting AMT; not necessarily one that requires RDIMMs) if you're building a NAS? NASes are servers in terms of their workload. Take advantages of the features designed for server customers.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#96
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$120 is sensitive amount of money for someone who wants to use a machine only for development. I am wondering why AMD would manufacture ultra low end potato cards which would cost like $35, only for office use. That would boost the sales big time.

You could just buy older-gen AMD cards? They still work. Like Apple with their hardware, AMD sees no reason to produce new "value" SKUs, when you can just buy their 1–3-gen-old flagship cards for "value" prices.

They still work, until they don't because the vendor stops supporting them.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#97
post #95
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still need something for boot graphics for the BIOS, unless non-server motherboards are coming with serial redirection default enabled and nobody mentioned it.

I mean, why not use a server motherboard (i.e. one supporting AMT; not necessarily one that requires RDIMMs) if you're building a NAS? NASes are servers in terms of their workload. Take advantages of the features designed for server customers.

Availability and cost naturally. A big part of the appeal here is the low price point for a great spec bare-bones home server using these consumer parts.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#98
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could just buy older-gen AMD cards? They still work. Like Apple with their hardware, AMD sees no reason to produce new "value" SKUs, when you can just buy their 1–3-gen-old flagship cards for "value" prices.

They still work, until they don't because the vendor stops supporting them.

I've yet to see a graphics card which stopped being supported in reasonable terms. Except if you count 3dfx or other really old stuff, at which point it gets silly. Or awesome, guess it's kinda retro by now.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#99
post #22

Intel can't match this performance to price ratio

Maybe but we can't tell from this article which should have compared against the $75 Core i3-9100F or maybe the $160 Core i5-9400F, instead of filling their graphs full of unavailable, ancient Intel parts like the 4th-gen core i7 that launched in 2014, and then listing the 2014 MSRP as if that was a relevant point of comparison.

Linus from LinusTechTips did include that specific processor, and even the 150$ Core i5 (I forgot which one specifically).

I recommend you see that video for the comparison you're asking for.

Re: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100 CPU Review: A Budget Gaming Bonanza

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DaVinci Resolve would be one such editor

It still benefits from a faster CPU, at least when paired with a top-end GPU: https://www.pugetsystems.com/recommended/Recommended-Systems...

Yep! CPU is definitely still important.
Post reply on HN