Live data from Hacker News

Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

reclaimthenet.org

91–100 of 298 posts

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#92
post #75
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI, Reddit's major investors include one big Internet company from Shenzhen Advance publications is also having huge exposure to China through Condenast's business in China

Which company is that? Wikipedia says they're independent with the majority shareholder being a New York company called Advance Publications

https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/11/18216134/reddit-tencent-i...

"Reddit gets a $150 million investment from Tencent and users are posting memes to mock the deal"

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#93
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a bad take. I don't follow the_donald or its memes. I'm saying that if you build a community that is committed to breaking the rules of reddit it's going to get banned. You can insert knitting for fascism. It's the same across the board.

Only difference is that apparently fascism violates the ToS and knitting does not.

The actual difference is that certain ideologies attract people who think the ends justify the means or find transgression itself attractive and amusing; these qualities in the right combination lead to communities that will inevitably break the rules and undo themselves.

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#95

I personally think that this article buried the lede as far as controversial Reddit actions go. Users now can be (and have been) banned for upvoting posts in quarantined subreddits (both on the right - T_D - and the left - Chapo Trap House - among others). I've seen controversy erupt all around Reddit about this and it doesn't feel right to me. If the content that people are upvoting is bad enough to get banned over…

"Don't encourage them" is a standard admonishment given to people in a group IRL when one member is acting out. And it's demonstrably impossible for moderators to find and remove 100% of content in violation of policy. It pushes added responsibility on the upvoters to think before they upvote, but perhaps that is a fair request to make of forum participants. (And taking off my "community moderator" hat and putting on…

Yes, if a user can be banned for repeatedly upvoting posts that encourage brigading or actual violence, I don’t see why users who repeatedly upvote the same content shouldn’t be included. Either there are rules which have meaningful sanctions or there aren’t.

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#96

The 'frontpage of the internet' is actively taking control of the subreddit of a presidential candidate, in an election year. I know that HN is highly against Trump, and probably cheer for this decision, but how is this not a democratic issue?

You say this as if the members of r/the_donald are just regular ol' folks just talkin' about their candidate. This was/is one of the most rule-breaking subreddits on the entire website, which has only survived until this day due to preferential treatment. Subreddits have been completely banned for much, much less.

It is one of the largest subreddits and it deals with a highly charged topic (politics) so naturally it draws in all the trolls.

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#97
post #60

I personally think that this article buried the lede as far as controversial Reddit actions go. Users now can be (and have been) banned for upvoting posts in quarantined subreddits (both on the right - T_D - and the left - Chapo Trap House - among others). I've seen controversy erupt all around Reddit about this and it doesn't feel right to me. If the content that people are upvoting is bad enough to get banned over…

> Users now can be (and have been) banned for upvoting posts in quarantined subreddits I've heard this thrown around, but I thought it was for upvoting posts that are later removed for violating Reddit's rules - not just upvoting any posts on quarantined subreddits. I can't figure out if this is the case, though, here is what Reddit said, I think: > Users who consistently upvote policy-breaking content within quarant…

And that's fair. I should've done a better job differentiating between the official word and the word of random Redditors that have a vested interest in making themselves look better. I have to assume the actual implementation will look for like the former than the latter.

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#98

I personally think that this article buried the lede as far as controversial Reddit actions go. Users now can be (and have been) banned for upvoting posts in quarantined subreddits (both on the right - T_D - and the left - Chapo Trap House - among others). I've seen controversy erupt all around Reddit about this and it doesn't feel right to me. If the content that people are upvoting is bad enough to get banned over…

>If the content that people are upvoting is bad enough to get banned over shouldn't it just be removed from the site and not left up to upvote?

Honeypot.

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#99
post #49

The 'frontpage of the internet' is actively taking control of the subreddit of a presidential candidate, in an election year. I know that HN is highly against Trump, and probably cheer for this decision, but how is this not a democratic issue?

HN is actually surprisingly pro-Trump. I have been shocked at the broad support for economic nationalism (trade protectionism, etc.) from HN participants, as well as the chorus of agreement with Trump's anti-China stance.

You're shocked that there are people who support liberty as a concept and they are anti-China as a result?

Re: Reddit purges 1/2 of The Donald’s moderators – replaces them with approved mods

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the end, the reddit admins aren't responsible for moderating whatsapp. Replacing TD moderators isn't a solution to end white nationalism, it's just about policing a forum which consistently flaunts site rules. If those people want to build their own site, with blackjack and hookers, they're more than welcome to. I mean, that's where Voat came from.

Whatever one's personal views, selective enforcement has been used as a stick with which to beat certain groups and should concern everyone, even if–perhaps especially if–you aren't a member of the group being beaten at the moment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_enforcement

Really tasteless, given the actual number of Indian Hindu nationalists currently physically using sticks to beat and kill Muslims, given how that's the context of the current thread. Those people should be deplatformed and jailed. They hate other people an plan violence against them. Should be a really simple moderation decision and really simple adminisgrative decision to report them and provide their user data to law enforcement.
Post reply on HN