Well, I'm probably on a list now. Thanks for that.
We are all on multiple lists...
Now we've just been added to another list of people that know they're on lists.
Ruin My Search History
91–100 of 211 posts
Re: Ruin My Search History
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Public... >Firefox (and Chrome) disable Pin Validation for Pinned Hosts whose validated certificate chain terminates at a user-defined trust anchor (rather than a built-in trust anchor). This means that for users who imported custom root certificates all pinning violations are ignored. That last sentence is key. From Wikipedia: some browsers "disable pinning for c…
What does that have to do with wifi certificates?
If you add CA certificates for the Wifi they probably (I'm not sure if you can tell it manually to not do that) are added to the system-wide trust store. IE and Chrome check that for CAs, Firefox will soon (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265113)
(all this for Windows, I believe the same is true for OS X, Linux depends on your specific your setup)
Re: Ruin My Search History
#93Re: Ruin My Search History
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know this for a fact? If the roles were reversed would you delete? Or would you just like and say you did?
If I were in charge of a publicly traded company I most definitely wouldn't want a scandal like that lurking beneath the surface. It would absolutely leak.
The existence of classified programs that remain classified and unknown for years is evidence against this oft-used argument.
Re: Ruin My Search History
#95Re: Ruin My Search History
#96Some what related is the UTM Mangler; a browser extension that auto-replaces UTM campaign parameters with more interesting alternatives: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/utm-mangler/ngddln... (source code: https://github.com/huntwelch/UTM-Mangler)
Re: Ruin My Search History
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do companies really MITM SSL traffic in order to watch employees surfing habits?
Yep, IronPort is one product, but our network guys have been saying something about it being built into the latest Cisco series 6 routers? That's the enterprise life
[deleted]
Re: Ruin My Search History
#98Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot. Why did this happen? IP address: * Time: 2016-06-10T00:07:58Z URL: https://www.google.com/search?q=donald%20trump It appears Google is not too happy with Donald Trump.
They call that a DDoT.
Re: Ruin My Search History
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know this for a fact? If the roles were reversed would you delete? Or would you just like and say you did?
If I were representing a big, well known company with lots of money to give out in settlements, I'd be much more likely not to say anything than to bother lying.
That's not universal. When a company screws up, an individual rarely goes down for it. The impact of the crime is often absorbed by many people (or no one).
Re: Ruin My Search History
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
They actually do delete.
How do you know this for a fact? If the roles were reversed would you delete? Or would you just like and say you did?
(Tedious disclaimer: my opinion only, not speaking for anybody else. I'm an SRE at Google.)
I can happily endorse the company's public statements on this subject: personal data will be deleted within the timeframes specified (for obvious technical and that's-a-bad-idea reasons, it's not instant). Part of SRE's function is to arrange for SLAs to be met, including deletion SLAs.